Bert Dohmen's  Latest Predictions: APPLE- JCPENNEY

The Coming China CrisisUpdated Edition

BUY NOW

NEW BOOK!

Financial Apocalypse

A Must read!

 

The global financial crisis of 2008 was the worst crisis since the 1930’s. Wall Street honchos and Washington “leaders” tell the public that no one could have predicted it. That apparently is the excuse for not having taken steps to prevent it. But it’s a lie.

 


 

THE TRUTH BEHIND THE GLOBAL CREDIT CRISIS; REVEALED!

THIS BOOK MAY SAVE YOU A FORTUNE!         

BUY NOW !

 


There was one analyst, Bert Dohmen, who warned at the beginning of 2008, that starting in September, 08 the global financial markets would teeter on the brink. On 2007, he wrote a book, entitled: PRELUDE TO MELTDOWN, which predicted the current crisis. At the time, Washington regulators were oblivious to the problems which Bert Dohmen predicted would engulf the global financial system. 


BERT DOHMEN'S  ECONOMIC PLAN REVEALED!

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD

 


USEFUL TOOLS

THE FABLE of the “FEARFUL” DEFICITS

 


RENEW YOUR SUBSCRIPTION
SUBSCRIBE NOW AND GET IMMEDIATE ACCESS!
SMARTE TRADER SAMPLE
SMARTE TRADER Q & A
 WELLINGTON SAMPLE
FEARLESS ETF SAMPLE
FEARLESS ETF Q&A
PRIVATE PORTFOLIOS SAMPLE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Timing is  Everything!              

              Sign up for Bert Dohmen’s Market Views. Enter your e-mail Address:  


                           UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES

By Bert Dohmen  June 1, 2013

To buy stocks right now is to bet on the willingness of the major central banks (that is, Europe, the Federal Reserve, Japan, and China) to create as much money as possible to prevent a stock market and economic disaster.

Prudent analysts say the ratio of a country’s debt to its GDP is already too high for many countries. Our view is that no one knows what is too high.

Whether debt is 100% or 260% (Japan) of GDP, who says the central banks can’t double it? Who is to say that in a market crisis, the Fed or BOJ in Japan can’t double their monthly infusions? In fact, we consider that ratio somewhat artificial and perhaps meaningless. GDP measures total economic activity. What does it have to do with the government’s debt? The government doesn’t produce the GDP. It’s comparing apples and oranges. It would be more relevant to compare governmental debt to tax receipts.

Before the Greenspan/Bernanke era, the current rate of money creation would have been unthinkable. But anything and everything is possible now. Imagine, the Fed is now buying from 70%-80% of all Treasury securities sold to finance the deficit. There is no reason it can’t go to 100% or higher. We are not saying it is good or prudent, just that there is no limit… until no one wants to accept your currency.

Believing that at some point the central banks will “get religion” and reverse their questionable policies is like believing in Santa Claus. History shows that the worse the conditions become, the greater the policy errors of governments. Just read about the German hyperinflation of the early 1920s, or Zimbabwe, or China, or John Law in France. To have a sense of history now is to be ahead of the pack. More


WHAT’S AHEAD:

By Bert Dohmen  May 4, 2013

Over the next several months, we will see some disappointments in reported corporate sales and earnings. Those stocks will suffer. Will the stock market care? So far it hasn’t.

 Operating earnings are down 2% year-over-year, yet the stock market rose to new all-time highs. The S&P 500 is selling at a P/E of 15.5. With operating earnings declining over the past year and the economy now apparently in a weak spell, stocks are no longer cheap. However, Wall Street doesn’t advertise the “operating earnings,” and uses “reported earnings,” which are better. Operating P/E ratios are not such bargains.

 We again have stocks like Linked In, Amazon, Google, etc. selling at P/E ratios reminiscent of 1998-1999. But they are still rising. It’s a signal that there is a lot of speculative capital available for stock because it has nowhere else to go. Eventually, the ending won’t be pretty, similar to the year 2000. But for now, big profits can still be made.

 The essential thing is to have an advisor who uses technical analysis to catch the tops. And that is what we have done consistently for the past 35 years.

 If you believe that there will be some type of economic recovery later this year, then buying select stocks will still pay off. Our technical indicators are positive on a many stocks.

 As always, you must be willing to sit through some periods of volatility. Nothing goes up in a straight line. If you buy stocks now, you have the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank (ECB), the Bank of Japan, and China’s central bank on your side. They are basically providing an insurance that the markets will not have a big decline. That’s a very good guarantee…until eventually it doesn’t work anymore. But for now, it’s the best guarantee investors could ever hope for.

The Fed hopes that its $85 billion per month monetary injection will eventually help to produce a stronger economy. Right now that liquidity goes into speculation, such as real estate and stocks. More


GOLD: THE WAR ON GOLD

By Bert Dohmen  April 18, 2013

We are now seeing a ‘war on gold.’ For the past several months we have been mentioning that the gold bullion banks and the central banks were putting lots of downward pressure on paper gold so as to discourage those who thought that gold was better than paper money.

Although we have been bullish on gold for the long term (i.e. 5 or more years), we turned bearish on the intermediate term. In our Feb. 15 issue of our WELLINGTON LETTER, we wrote:

In the longer term, gold has broken the 200-day m.a., which by definition says it’s in a bear market now. A rally now would not necessarily mean a new uptrend. There is a lot of resistance to overcome on any upmove. To look at a chart objectively, pretend you don’t know what it is. Then ask yourself: would you buy it or sell it? That’s the way to keep your emotions out. Now that all indications have turned bearish, the big hedge funds are known to have significantly reduced their positions and the big bullion banks are easily manipulating the price downward. Because there are so many individual investors in gold, we could see a further, self-feeding decline.

We were especially bearish on the gold and silver mining stocks. However, we did not think that gold would plunge $250 in three days as it has done.

We view this as an orchestrated campaign to discourage people who think that gold may be a better asset than paper currencies. After an $84 per ounce loss on Friday, most of it after the London trading closed, gold plummeted $155 on Monday.

Last week, the Establishment issued a warning about what was ahead. First Goldman Sachs (GS) gave a ‘sell signal’ on gold. GS said: “We believe a sharp rebound in gold prices is unlikely. The fall in prices could end up being faster and larger than our forecast, as aggregate speculative net long positions across Comex futures and gold ETFs remain near record highs.”

 GS gave a six- to twelve-month target of $1,490 and $1,390. GS is not an impartial observer. They are heavily involved in precious metals trading for their own account. Such warnings from GS are usually given before the event and too often ignored by the general public. They are not forecasting; they’re telling you what the agenda is.

In our trading service, SMARTE TRADER, we sold the mining stocks short about two weeks ago. More


To read more articles go down the page to: ARTICLES OF INTEREST .


Bert Dohmen's  MARKET FORCASTS 2011-2012


Bert Dohmen's Market Calls late 2011

 

Bert Dohmen's Market Calls 2010/2011

Bert Dohmen's Market Calls 2007/2010

 

 

 

UNSURPASSED PERFORMANCE!

 

Bert Dohmen Market Calls: 2008-2009

 

Bert Dohmen Market Calls: 2007-2008

 

These signals are incredible, especially considering that the DOW JONES INDUSTRIALS AVERAGE plunged 35% during the same time. Here you can clearly see the superiority of our services.

 


How can you make money in Bull and Bear markets?

Whether the markets SOAR or   CRASH, you can

prosper with Dohmen Capital Research!

 

Dohmen Capital Research group was founded in 1977 by Bert Dohmen as an economic and investment research firm. Our mission has been to provide serious investors and traders with the most profitable investment and economic advice, available anywhere, via subscription services. The advice will always be unbiased and will not have any conflicts of interest. We don’t hesitate to give sell advice, or to sell short, when our work calls for it.

The analysis is designed to help you make the right choices and decisions on how to invest your money and prosper over both the short and long-term. Serious investors will find a wealth of profit-making investment and economic guidance. Bert Dohmen's long time experience in the markets will be working for you.

The firm’s services have achieved the highest acclaim. Dohmen Capital Research offers the most highly respected and sought-after advisory services for investors worldwide. The first publication was THE WELLINGTON LETTER, which has achieved numerous awards of distinction. It quickly made its mark on Wall Street with often totally contrarian forecasts, such as the 20% prime rate in 1980, the roaring bull market in gold and silver, followed by the 20 year bear market, and a decline in U.S. T-bonds of over 40% in the late 1970’s among others.

Learn more about Bert Dohmen and Dohmen Capital Research


MORE ARTICLES OF INTEREST

RIGHT ON SCHEDULE—A CORRECTION!

(excerpted from the March 31 Wellington Letter)

Our attempt at poetry:

Pop the champagne corks, dance in the street, celebrate the record high S&P!

Well, it’s only by a fraction, but it is still a new high. The S&P 500 closed at 1569, about five points above the previous all-time high set on Oct. 9, 2007. Long-time subscribers will remember that at that time we gave a “sell” signal just two trading days later. Those who believed that a new high was bullish had a bad surprise, as it was followed by the 2008 crisis.

Last Friday’s new high was made on the last trading day of the month and the quarter. Big hedge funds had every reason to support the market going into the close today in order to maximize their performance fees. Next week we should get a better idea whether a pullback or market correction will be allowed.

As you know, there are many clues that the rally of the last three months involved a bit of engineering. We have discussed the role of the PPT (the President’s Working Group on the Financial Markets), which has the authority to produce “orderly markets.” We believe that there has been mission creep and that the mission now is to produce a rising market. Just notice that almost each day, the DJI is up 40-60 points, even on days when the market tumbled early in the morning based on adverse news.

Additionally, since May 6, 2011, HFT (high-frequency trading) operations have no longer acted to knock the market down, even on a daily basis. On that day, the DJI tumbled almost 1,000 points in less than an hour. The regulators at first blamed it on a “fat finger,” that is, some clerk with a fat finger pressing the wrong key on a computer. That excuse was laughable. More


THE ILLUSIVE TOP—PART II

By Bert Dohmen.

The market has been defying all the technical rules, as well as market history, and could continue to so. We have never had the Federal Reserve pursuing such an aggressive attitude.

Steve Forbes said, “We are in uncharted waters now.” He is so right.

Eventually, when inflation starts rising, the Fed will have to start withdrawing stimulus. At the first sign of that, it will be a race to the exits in the investment markets. There is no painless way to exit from this, contrary to what Bernanke thinks.

The earnings growth of US listed companies in Q4 was down from one year before. Yet the stock market had a great Q1 this year. What happened to the theory that the market reflects earnings growth? Analysts who did their homework have stayed very cautious, because of the dismal numbers. However, if you didn’t look at all the technical flaws in the markets, disregarded the negatives, and bet on a better future, then you would have been bullish.

The Optimist’s View

The bears make a good point: the last time the DJI was at this level, unemployment was around 4% and the economy was humming. Now unemployment is 7.7%, the number of unemployed is at a record high, etc.

The only problem with that argument is that liquidity trumps all those economic factors. Money is much more relevant.

The massive monetary creation by the Fed is producing the fuel for the rally. Unless you think that will stop, the market should rise until Bernanke leaves, though with periodic market corrections. We all know that this cannot end well. But the day of reckoning may still be a long time in the future.

The pessimists have given too much credence to the reality of the unsustainable debt globally and not enough importance to the power of infinite money creation by the central banks. More


The Illusive Rally Top

By Bert Dohmen.

1. Several important things happened during January to give the market up move a little more life:

2. The big battle about raising the debt ceiling has been postponed. The Republicans have chosen to retreat for now and delay D-day until May.

Japan embarked on a massive reflation program, designed to plunge the value of the yen, increase the sales of large Japanese firms abroad, and boost the stock market. It wants to create inflation where there is none. This has big international implications.

3. The Fed has made it known that its stimulus in 2014 may be 40% bigger than the one in 2013, $1.4 trillion.

4. The implementation of the new Basel III requirements for banks was postponed. These would have required large global banks to post higher reserves on a number of debt classifications, which banks were just unable to do. They either would have had to sell billions of dollars of stock or sell big units of their firms,. Neither was possible in the current environment. This had been a great concern. Now it’s removed.

The Basel III is one of those complicated, small items that the average person didn’t even want to know about. But it presented huge problems for banks that were not able to sell assets fast enough to be in compliance.

It was very much like the “mark-to-market” rule that helped to precipitate the global crisis starting in 2007. It required banks to write down the value of assets (such as long-term bonds) to market value, even if the banks intended to hold them until maturity. Banks’ loans had to be written down, even though the borrowers were current in their payments. It was a ridiculous rule.

In 2007, I wrote that the rule would cause a banking crisis. The regulators didn’t understand that. When finally (in March 2009) the Congress told the FASB to rescind the rule, saying “or we will do it for you,” the bottom in the market crash was in place. That’s how important it was. Yet probably only 1 out of 1000 investors was aware of it. (Read about this in our book, Financial Apocalypse, where we have our real-time analysis on this and other events of 2008.)

The stock market indices continue to float upwards, totally ignoring any negatives in the U.S. or abroad. Nothing seems to matter—chaos in Egypt, Syria, Iran’s nuclear “accident,” negative U.S. GDP growth, etc. As you know, I don’t believe that this is market forces at work; instead, it is Ben Bernanke’s Fed making sure that confidence stays as high as the S&P index even while GDP growth stutters into negative territory. But that may come to an end…very soon.

As I have written in the Wellington Letter, my view is that “the President’s Working Group on the Financial Markets,” which has the official mission to “preserve orderly markets,” has changed its mission slightly. Now it appears to be “to assure that there is no meaningful market decline.” It is allowed to manipulate the markets via the stock index futures.

So, the question is, what is the agenda, and will the Fed allow a much needed correction?

(read the entire article at this link:  http://onforb.es/14Ge4Af


“Six Reasons Why I STILL Wouldn't Own APPLE Stock”

By Bert Dohmen. January 25,2013

(Bert Dohmen’s prescient view on Apple as featured on FORBES.COM)

On Dec. 5, I wrote an article entitled Seven Reasons Why I Wouldn’t Own Apple Stock Now; judging by some of the comments to the article, it was like attacking the Pope.

When emotions on a stock get that high, you know it’s a bubble.

I’ve been asked by investors to give my current views. I look at stocks unemotionally. I don’t care much about the widgets a company makes. I focus on what management is doing. The most important factor in producing a major trend change in the price of a stock, outside of economic conditions, is a change in the company.

Apple (AAPL) was made the most successful company ever by Steve Jobs. When he left, a new management took over. As an investor, you have to adjust to such an important change.

Here is the recent history of my observations:

  1. As early as late August 2012, I wrote on twitter.com that the boom in Apple was coming to an end because the new CEO had shown a trend of “disappointment.” Every new product since then was less than expected. Steve Jobs always delivered more than expected.

  2. Apple hit its all-time high of $705 on Sept. 21. Six days later, I wrote on twitter that my downside target was $520. That seemed outrageous, but it was hit about three weeks later on Nov. 16.

  3. On that day, I predicted a rally to $581. The rally actually hit $589, just a bit higher. Thereafter, I predicted that the next decline would go to $422.

Here are my six reasons why I still wouldn’t own Apple stock.

(for the entire article, please go to forbes.com. Link:  http://onforb.es/W4mZ9r


A CHINA RECOVERY or JUST A BOUNCE?

By Bert Dohmen. January 2013

China’s manufacturing picked up for the third straight month in November. We had predicted a short-term improvement, as the Communist Party Congress needed some good news while appointing a new government.

The “official” PMI (from the government) rose to 50.6 in November from 50.2 in October and 49.8 in September. That’s a seven-month high. However, it was below expectations. This PMI measures the large firms, the SOEs, which are mostly governmentally owned. A reading below 50 indicates an economic contraction. We don’t think the governmental number is reliable.

An analyst with the Development Research Center of the State Council said the report indicates that “companies have finished cutting inventories, which points to further expansion in coming months.”

We prefer the HSBC private sector PMI, which focuses on SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises). It gained only slightly but at least got above 50 for the first time in 13 months, which means anemic expansion. The bulls say this signals a coming recovery. We believe it’s just a normal counter-trend bounce.

Let’s look at some of the important commodities.

Chinese steel prices have declined sharply this year, as shown by the chart. This is painful for the cities whose steel mills are major employers. Therefore, everything is done to give the appearance that all is well in the steel business. More


Seven Reasons Why I Wouldn't Own Apple Stock Now

An article written for Forbes.com   By Bert Dohmen

I loved Apple’s products, its marketing, and thought the Apple stores were sheer genius, especially with the “Genius Bar.” I always asked, why doesn’t Microsoft, with all its billions of dollars, do this? Well, MSFT finally started imitating Apple, with limited success. Too little, too late.

I turned bearish on Apple stock for various reasons in late August this year. (See my postings on Twitter.com.) In our advisory services, such as the Wellington Letter, I started warning that soon we would see “buyer exhaustion.” Was there any money manager who didn’t own the stock? When everyone is in, the smallest hint of disappointment can turn into a selling binge.

On September 21, the stock hit an all-time high of $705. That was the “exhaustion” point. Thereafter, I concluded that an important  top could  be in place and that a meaningful decline was ahead.

My downside target was $520, which seemed crazy when the stock was at $700. My reasons:

(for the rest of the article on Forbes.com, please go to this link:  http://onforb.es/TKmyje


WILL RESOLVING THE “FISCAL CLIFF” RESOLVE THE “ECONOMIC CLIFF?”

Excerpt from the Wellington Letter November 13,2012

Our work strongly suggests that the incomprehensible, low-volume market rally in late summer was clearly manipulated. It defied all fundamentals, logic, and technicals. We wrote that eventually reality would have to erase the huge divergence between market action and economic fundamentals, not only in the US, but globally. With the election, and the elimination of any hope of economic improvement, the bearish trends should now fully exert themselves. It won’t be pleasant for the bulls.

The leading and most beloved stocks—Apple, Google, and Amazon—look absolutely dismal (see the CHARTIST section). These were the leaders to the upside, and they will now lead to the downside.

It will be similar to early 2008. There will be periodic rallies based on renewed hopes, but they will quickly fade away. Eventually, there could be another full-blown crisis similar to the one in late 2008.

This creates great opportunities for well-informed traders and investors. Our clients had the chance to make great profits during the 2008-2009, and we aim to repeat that. We can’t change the global situation, but at least we can take steps to protect ourselves.

(After the election) we advised taking positions in the inverse ETFs that are geared to rise in price as the index or sector declines. Investors who are not very experienced, as well as those who intend to stay with their positions for a long time, should stick to the non-leveraged ETFs.

Analyst Tony Boeckh, who headed up the excellent Bank Credit Analyst publication for many years, calculates that a total of $US20.1 TRILLION has been spent by the governments and central banks of the US, Japan, Europe and China between 2008 and 2012: $US13.1 TRILLION in budget deficits and $US7 TRILLION in central bank asset purchases. The size of this reflation is without precedent. He says this has been responsible for avoiding another Great Depression and 20-year bear market. More


POST ELECTION ASSESSMENT

 by Bert Dohmen

Excerpt from the Wellington Letter November 7,2012

All the beneficiaries of a change in the Washington leadership we outlined in our last issue should now be shunned. The opposite side of the trades makes more sense.

(specific recommendations deleted out of fairness to subscribers)

Don’t be fooled by any political promises about “cooperation” and “reaching across the aisle.” If you didn’t like the last four years, you will the next four even less. Expect higher taxes, higher usage fees, much bigger federal government, less freedom, greater economic misery for most people, and global recession. These trends will produce even more poverty, much bigger social programs (making people depend on government), much greater federal deficits, necessitating even more money creation by the Fed.

EUROPE:

The turmoil in Europe is starting up again with violent riots in Greece as the parliament considers more austerity and higher taxes. The head of the European central bank (ECB), Mario Draghi, said today that Germany’s economy is now approaching recession.

The September economic numbers out of Europe are terrible. Germany’s factory orders fell 3.3% month over month in September, the most in a year, following a 0.8% decline in August. That’s a pattern of accelerating deterioration.

Draghi also said today that debt-related “difficulties” are “starting to affect the German economy.” The EU has now substantially downgraded next year’s growth to 0.1%. That’s a political forecast. The reality is a big recession.

The Eurozone economy in September had the sharpest decline in economic activity, according to Markit.com. In France, the president initiated a hike in the sales tax. The question is whether Greece will get the next loan. We say it will. For the EU, a loan is cheaper and easier than a default.

France’s sales tax will increase in January 2014 to 20% from 19.6%. Its restaurant sales tax will rise to 10% from 7%.

THE WORLD:

In Japan, the sales tax will double to 10%. The last time they did this, the recovery aborted and the country plunged immediately into deep recession again.

In China, corporate earnings excluding financials fell 18.2% from a year ago. The party congress starts on Nov. 8, when the Communist Party leadership will install Xi Jinping. More.


The most important election in 80 years

 by Bert Dohmen

Excerpt from the Wellington Letter October 31, 2012

The major indices have floated mostly upward for several months without any evidence of buying pressure but with an absence of selling. It almost appears that money managers, even those who think the market has severe headwinds, don’t want to sell as long as the market continues upward.

When fundamentals such as declining earnings, deteriorating economic conditions, and especially volume trends don’t seem to support an upmove, it’s a time to be very cautious. When the selling finally starts and the uptrend is broken, it can unleash a lot of selling, especially in all the institutional favorites.

The big unknown is the election. Let’s look at the fundamental background for the next several months, the bullish and the bearish side.

Potentially Bullish: 

A change in the White House:

1.  New, workable policies, cooperation with Congress, effective planning, a true CEO in charge 

2.  An end to anti-business policies.

3.  A revitalization of entrepreneurial spirit. Businesspeople would start hiring and expanding.

Potentially Bearish:

No change in the White House:

1. The anticipatory buying of stocks over the past several months would be reversed. Stocks would probably be dumped. Buying would dry up.

2.  The “financial cliff” that would raise tax rates by 43% on the middle class and higher income earners. Some estimates are for a severe plunge in the economy.

3.  All hopes for an economic recovery would be shattered as a continuation of the policies of the past four years would probably be followed. The next four years would be worse as the entire globe would go into  recession/depression.

4.  No hope that the USA could be the engine to pull the globe—primarily Europe and China—out of the ditch. Global recessions!

Therefore, the election is absolutely critical for the nation, the world, for businesses, and for people who are looking for decent jobs. It may be the most important election since the 1930s. More.


IS THE EMPLOYMENT NUMBER TRULY “UNBELIEVABLE”?

October 5, 2012, by Bert Dohmen

The U.S. unemployment rate announced today plunged below 8%, from 8.1% to 7.8%. Economists had expected a rise to 8.2%. When 2 plus 2 doesn’t add up to 4, there is great skepticism. Many observers ask, has Washington adopted the Chinese method of producing economic growth:  pressure the statisticians?

Do you smell a rotten fish somewhere? In China, the party bosses tell the statisticians the number they want, and magically, that’s the economic number they get. The big job creator, our president, now has the lowest unemployment rate since he took office. However, only 114,000 jobs were added in September versus a revised 142,000 in August. So, it actually worsened.

Now get this:  The “household survey” showed a phenomenal gain of 873,000 in employment, the biggest since June 1983. However, 582,000 of these were part- time positions. How do they get that number? The government calls about 60,000 households and asks if people have worked the last month. If I were asked, I might ask, “what do you consider work? How many hours? For pay, or without compensation, etc? Does it count if I do something for a relative?”

We wonder what the specific question on the phone was? Like, “if you worked a few hours for your father in law, like helping him move a couch or mow the lawn, that counts as part time work.”  (Believe it or not, it does! Furthermore, if one person had 5 part time jobs during the month, that’s counted as five new jobs. Apparently, it’s counted as a job even if there is no compensation.) More.


EUROPE, THE FED, and the GLOBAL MONEY MACHINE

By Bert Dohmen , September 23, 2012

The immediate problem in Europe is that ECB president Mario Draghi said that if Spain or other countries want the ECB to buy those sovereign bonds in the market place, Spain will have to formally ask the ECB and its emergency fund for assistance. That is a tough thing to do for proud European governments. Spain will probably wait until things get much more serious before putting in a formal request.

Draghi said last month when he made his statement to scare the short sellers:  “Within our mandate, the ECB is ready to do whatever it takes to preserve the euro. And believe me, it will be enough,”

Well, this is more a threat than a plan. Germany isn’t that easy to roll over. It’s again the battle of the politicians, in this case the Germans, and the central bankers. If the bankers don’t get their way, then they will let things deteriorate into another serious crisis in order to get everyone on board of a money printing agenda.

How will all this end? That’s a question most politicians around the world, except for Germany, are not asking. We say “every action produces a reaction.” That is how the universe functions.

Currently, the major central banks are producing massive amounts of money out of thin air in order to pile new debt on top of the old debt, which is already too high to service. In 50 years, people will wonder: how could they ever think that this would work?

It’s the ultimate human folly. These actions will eventually bring about a huge reaction. The current fiat money system, which has absolutely no limits imposed on it, will result in people refusing to accept the paper money. That is what history teaches, but central bankers like to forget.

Throughout history, over-indebtedness of governments has resulted in them taking more gold or silver content out of coins, until no one would accept their currency and the citizens started using the unadulterated coins of the neighboring countries. That resulted in penalties, including death, for anyone using the other coins. Eventually, the governments with diluted currencies fell. In today’s world, governments have totally (not just partially) eliminated gold and silver and have given us pieces of paper with ink on it. More.


GOLD: A GREAT BUYING OPPORTUNITY?  

By Bert Dohmen , August  31, 2012

We receive many questions about where gold is headed from investors who claim to have the long-term view but then get emotional about every bounce or drop. If you are truly a gold investor, you will say, “I will look at it in five years, not in between.”

Often it’s very good to read back issues of the WELLINGTON LETTER. Here is what we wrote in January 19 this year. Even if you read it at that time, it would be good to reread it, because it is just as valid now.

One concern about mining stocks is that it is getting harder and harder to find new deposits and that it takes 10 years to get a mine into operations. However, that represents great opportunities for companies that have proven reserves and are in operation. It also means that the demand/supply relationship for gold is bullish because of growing scarcity.

No matter what happens over the short term, we believe the long term trend is very bullish for gold. But it’s always a very volatile ride and many investors are shaken out during the inevitable corrections and then don’t get back in.

The miners have been underperforming the metals. There are always some fundamental concerns. Early this year it was that their costs of mining were rising faster than the price of the gold. Another concern is that many of the underdeveloped countries where the mines are located may confiscate the mines. These are all valid.

On the other hand, the leverage of the miners is tremendous in a bull market. Even if gold has a steady, unspectacular rise, profits will rise nicely. Look at them as operating companies making a product which is in limited supply that cannot be created out of thin air by the central banks of the world. And that enables them to increase dividends very nicely.

The Financial Post of Canada reported in November that dividend payments from miners increased 75% in 2011, compared with a 26% increase in 2010. Analysts forecast that 2012 will see another 26% increase in distributions. In today’s markets, where every money manager is looking for income, that’s very meaningful.

We like the miners at this point because they have a lot of catching up to do. In 2011 gold was up, while the mining stocks were down double-digits. The sector is still not popular with institutions, although the interest is increasing. More.


THE REALITY of another EUROPEAN “FIX”

By Bert Dohmen , June 30, 2012

The big news came on the last day of June out of Europe, where the 27 EU members met. The announcement of a plan to have a plan scared the short sellers in the various markets, helped along by the Fed’s PPT (Plunge Protection Team) in cooperation with the various HFT operations. The global markets staged a big, one day surge. The sustainability of this rally is a big question mark once the big traders start analyzing what was done—and not done—in Europe.

Germany’s Angela Merkel capitulated, partially, but also got part of what she wanted, namely an EU regulator watching over the banking system in the EU. Contrary to some reports, Merkel did not give up her opposition to the Eurobond idea.

Participants consider the agreement on direct recapitalization of Spanish banks as the most important achievement. However, it depends on the creation of a European bank authority.

French President François Hollande said that this would not be achieved before year-end. EU Financial Services Commissioner Michel Barnie named the same timeline. Will the markets wait that long? Any plan that is eventually assembled will have to be ratified by the legislature of the 27 countries.

The fact that this time they addressed short-term bailout measures instead of the usual long-term goals indicates that the crisis was close to a very serious situation. We have reported on the huge withdrawals of deposits from the European banks. The report on Friday reflects desperation, as can be seen by Merkel partially caving in.... More.


“BATTEN DOWN THE HATCHES”

By Bert Dohmen (excerpt from the Wellington Letter)

Written May 30,2012

The global stock markets have now entered bear markets, although that is still refuted by most analysts. This presents great opportunities for short sellers or those who buy inverse ETFs.

Some call it the “dead zone.” This year it may be the “death zone.” It’s the period in the stock market from May to October which actually would have lost you money, cumulative, over the last sixty years, while the period from November to April would have produced excellent stock market profits, over 14% compounded annually. Our work shows that this year the death zone may be exactly that for the bulls.

However, the bears who follow our advice should have exceptional opportunities, just as in 2008

If you followed our advice, you may already have made enough in profits to pay for the Wellington Letter for the next 100 years. And that’s just in one weekMore.

Subscribe

       


OUR ADVISORY SERVICES

 

Bert Dohmen's SMARTE TRADER 

 

This Premier Advisory service, designed for short-term investors who want to trade stocks, short-sales and  options on a short term basis for potentially very exciting profits. More..

 

Bert Dohmen's FEARLESS ETF TRADER

 

Bert Dohmen's Fearless ETF Trader: Exciting service for short-term ETF and Index traders who may not have the time to keep up with 10-15 individual stocks and options but who still want to get involved in trading. More..

Bert Dohmen's PRIVATE PORTFOLIOS  

A service designed to let individual investors manage their own mutual fund and ETF portfolio. There is a choice of four different portfolios, which are monitored by us. It's the ideal way to avoid the high cost of managed accounts or financial planners. More..

Bert Dohmen's WELLINGTON LETTER

An award-winning investment and economic newsletter with an impressive 34 years in circulation. Targeted toward the serious investor and business executives, it has provided readers with the most accurate analysis and forecasts of the global economies and investment markets found anywhere. His readers have prospered in bull and bear markets alike. More..

Bert Dohmen's China Boom-Bust Analyst

To view more Bert Dohmen's Current Outlook click here


Potpourri by Bert Dohmen  

Potpourri is a very popular section of Bert Dohmen's Wellington Letter.


© Copyright Dohmen Capital Research Institute. All Rights Reserved. For questions and comments about this site, send e-mail to: client@dohmencapital.com


 MEDIA.VIDEOS.AUDIOS

 

 

CNBC Asia:Interview about APPLE


Interview with Jim Puplava

http://bit.ly/P5h6YN


Bert Dohmen with Gary Kaminsky (CNBC)


 

China the Dubai of 2012

Interview with

David McAlvany


  What Jim Cramer has    to say about

Bert Dohmen?

10- 27-2011


Bert Dohmen interview

with Michael Yorba

10- 27- 2011


 

CNBC: After the Crash


RECESSION!


Bert Dohmen with

Curt Renz Interview


Bert Dohmen with David McAlvany:  Being Prepared for the Possibility of Impossibility

Bert Dohmen


Bert Dohmen with Moneynews


World in Chaos

Bert Dohmen with

Jim Puplava


 

China: Boom or Bust?


    

Bert Dohmen

 Double Dip Recession


     

   Bert Dohmen :    One-on-One with Dan Mangru


   

The Economy: with Dan Mangru


   

GOLD


     

Currency markets


   

Technical Analysis


   Jim Cramer on Bert Dohmen, Video

V


Deflation Today, Hyperinflation Tomorrow.

 


No Time to buy and Hold