|

Continue from the home page..........
(for website: Excerpt from Wellington
Letter June 9, 2008)
THE
CREDIT CRISIS: STILL IN THE EARLY
PHASE
.................................The
very successful hedge fund firm T2
Partners in March wrote in a report:
"We are seeing only the tip of the
iceberg: An enormous wave of defaults,
foreclosures and auctions is just
beginning to hit the U.S. We believe
it will get so bad that large-scale
federal government intervention is
likely."
Jim Bianco, head of Bianco Research, a
very astute analyst of the credit
markets, said in March: "Equity
guys are completely clueless as to how
bad it is in the credit markets.
They're as bad as they've been since
the Great Depression." (Quote from
Barron's.)
This week we heard about proposals
circulating in Congress that it’s time
for STIMULUS PLAN #2. And where do
they get the money for these bailouts?
No, it's not the printing press. Now
we have computers that can create
billions of dollars instantaneously
out of thin air. No paper required.
The turmoil in the financial markets
will worsen. Later this year, there is
a good chance for a crisis. Will the
Fed be able to handle that? No one
knows.

BUYING
OPPORTUNITY FOR A TRADE
Excerpt
from the WELLINGTON LETTER, late April , 2008
........................... Bernanke recently commented on
the U.S. situation with that of Japan
in the 1990s, and even with the Great
Depression in the U.S., probably
because private sector analysts, such
as ourselves, had made such
comparisons. Of course, he says that
the current situation is much
different. What else can he say? He
says that in the 1930s the Fed let the
financial crisis infect the entire
economy. The Fed will not allow that
to happen now. But in early 2007, he
also said that the subprime mortgage
problem couldn’t possibly infect the
rest of the credit markets. Now it
has.
He rejected a comparison with Japan in the 1990s. He said
that Japan did not act to get bad
loans off the banks’ balance sheets,
which stopped lending. The Fed will
not make the same mistake. However,
that’s exactly the problem now. Only
U.S. banks are more proactive. They
are now busily raising new capital by
selling stock or convertible
securities. This dilutes the current
shareholders, who will take painful
hits. But at least the firms stay in
business, and eventually may start
lending again.
At least Ben finally seems to recognize the seriousness of
the situation; otherwise, he
wouldn’t make these comparisons. And
that’s the first step to finding a
solution. Then the question becomes,
is the problem solvable? He may know
the problems of the 1930s and of Japan
in the 1990s, but is he and his crew
astute enough to find the solutions?
There are so many rescue plans in the works, at the Fed, in
Congress, and in Europe, that it’s
hard to keep up with them. The IMF
(International Monetary Fund) is
floating a proposal to have the
governments, i.e., taxpayers, buy all
the unsalable paper (CDOs, Mortgage
Backed securities, etc.) from the
banks so that banks can start lending
again. The government would then hold
these until such a time that they can
be sold. I ask, if the taxpayers are
asked to take such a risk, will the
banks give us taxpayers some of the
profits they made over the last 5
years?
CONCLUSION
The (technical) signals for the U.S. market are positive
right now. No one can know how long a
rally will last. Instead of relying on
guesses, we prefer to let our
technical indicators tell us when the
end of a rally has been reached.
Last time we also wrote: “We will watch carefully over
the next week or two for a
confirmation of a tradable rally.
However, only experienced investors
should try to play such rallies.”
Well, it seems that we are there.
(Recommendations
are excerpted out of fairness to
subscribers)
A
DECOMPRESSION RALLY
Excerpt
from the WELLINGTON LETTER, April 7, 2008
...................The FHFB authorized Federal Home Loan
Banks to increase their purchases of agency mortgage-backed
securities. This could provide more than $100 billion in additional
liquidity to the FNMA and Freddie Mac’s mortgage-backed
securities. Also, the reserve requirements of the latter two were
lowered, allowing them to add another $200 billion to the mortgages
they buy.
As you can see, money is pouring into the financial
markets. But will that allow the
average homeowner to qualify for a
mortgage under current conditions?
Will it prevent foreclosures? Will it
get the homebuyers to go out looking?
And will they be able to get a
mortgage when they want to buy?
The Fed is now committed to take $200 billion of
non-government debt-securities, AAA
rated, as collateral on loans it
makes. Many of these securities may be
downgraded to AA, which means they
would be selling for around 25 cents
on the dollar. Will the Fed still take
them? Even the AAA stuff is probably
not worth more than 75% of par.
Obviously, when the Fed is willing to
take such confetti as collateral, it
means there is a huge financial
crisis.
THE FED: WILL THEY RUN OUT OF MONEY?
So far the Fed has used 50% of its balance sheet in the
bailouts. That’s about $400 billion.
Is the remaining $400 billion
sufficient to prevent the collapse of
the CDS market? Should they even try?
Important questions.
People say that the Fed can “print” all the money they
want. Actually, it’s the Bureau of
Engraving that prints money. They have
the latest, high-speed Heidelberg
presses. I know, I saw them. These
presses obviously are from Germany,
which during the hyperinflation after
WWI found that the printing presses
were too slow to keep up with
inflation. That has been corrected.
Our Fed chairman, Helicopter Ben, may
eventually do what he suggested five
years ago, namely throw money out of
helicopters. We have some exciting
times ahead of us.
It’s obvious that a panic hit Wall Street and Washington,
and the Fed is now pushing the gas
pedal to the floorboard. Look at some
of the Federal Reserve charts.
The first chart is Money Supply MZM. From Jan. 21 to Mar.
24, which doesn’t even include the
Bear Stearns crisis, MZM is growing at
a huge 37% annual rate. That confirms
that the Fed is in crisis mode, and
doesn’t want a repeat of the 1930s.
This is extraordinary growth.
Money Supply MZM. From Jan. 21 to Mar. 24
Another sign that the Fed has floored the monetary
accelerator is the ADJUSTED MONETARY
BASE. This reflects directly what the
Fed is doing. Note that the chart
shows a very significant breakout to
the upside. That’s positive for the
stock market and the economy. For the
economy, that could be inflationary.
Adjusted Monetary Base

And finally, we have to look at the banks. Are they
providing loans or are they shutdown,
and even more important, are
creditworthy borrowers willing to
borrow? The answer to both is
“Yes.” Here is the chart.
Bank Loans and Credit
CONCLUSION:
Experience tells us that when
the Fed steps this hard on the
accelerator, part of that money goes
into the stock market. As active
investors, that brings us some good
buying opportunities … at least for
awhile.
ASLEEP
AT THE WHEEL
Excerpt
from the WELLINGTON LETTER, March 17, 2008.
.................Throughout 2007, Wall Street analysts and
money managers told investors that the
subprime problem was too small to
infect other areas. We heard how
“minute” the size of that market
was compared to the entire debt
market; they told us that earnings
were greater and would be even greater
in 2008. And every time that the stock
market plunged, they insisted that
“the market is wrong,” and that
“the only thing we have to fear is
fear itself.”
Well, all of that was garbage and a prescription for ruin.
We repeated again and again that we
are seeing an implosion of the
greatest credit bubble the world had
ever seen. Therefore, earnings were
irrelevant, as they show the past. The
driving force in the markets is
availability of credit. When it
expands, the markets go up, and
earnings follow. When credit
availability decelerates, and then
even contracts as it is doing now, you
always have a bear market and
recession. And the severity of these
events is directly proportionate to
the contraction.
Therefore, whenever you see an analyst on TV talking about
the “great future earnings,” hit
the mute button. He has no idea about
what’s going on. Until one month
ago, Intel was on everyone’s
“buy” list. In early March, it
announced disappointment. Sandisk, a
maker of flash memory chips, announced
that prices of its product would
decline by 50% because of a glut. What
a surprise! You can imagine what such
a decline means for profits. The CEO
of Cisco late last year proclaimed on
national TV that he had never seen
conditions this good. Just two months
later, he was talking about abrupt
weakness.
(This is only part of the lengthy issue. Subscribe and get the
entire issue. It may be save or make
you a fortune)

RECOGNITION!
Excerpt
from the WELLINGTON LETTER, February 18, 2008.
...................Yes, historical
numbers are strong. But that’s
history. Just a few months ago, the
CEO of Cisco had a glowing report
about the firm and the economic
environment. I think he even said that
he had never seen conditions so good.
Well, his report on Feb. 6 was
downright gloomy. They reported
excellent results, (that’s the past)
but then said the future would be
worse than they had expected just
recently. The stock plunged over 10%
in after-hour trading.
The economy, especially the housing
sector, continues to worsen. Economist
Nouriel Roubini, who has been one of
the very few economists who saw the
current housing and credit crises
coming, just said that this year
20
million homes will see their values
decline to below the size of their
mortgages. That will cause
homeowners to just walk away from
their houses, and let the lenders
worry about selling the house.
On Feb. 13, Lehman Brothers said in a
report that sell-offs in leveraged
loans and CMBS (commercial mortgaged
backed securities) have recently
deepened. The firm believes that
defaults in these products could
spread to the “synthetic CDOs,”
potentially causing a more
“dramatic unwind.” I guess that could
ean a crash.
Lehman is concerned about exposure to
synthetic CDOs by broker-dealers—more
nuclear waste.
A few months ago, it was the SIVs,
i.e., off-balance sheet entities
formed by the largest banks to
speculate in the derivative markets.
It’s estimated that the problem is
bigger than $100 billion. Even
industry insiders have said they had
never heard of these entities before.
How can you hide a $100 billion
problem?
There are so many problems, which have
not yet been divulged. And each one
will cause a further contraction of
credit. Our long-time subscribers, who
have been with us for more than 20
years, know that
my Theory of Liquidity, which has made it possible for us to catch major
turns over the years, says that when
credit contracts, the investment
markets and the economy must decline.
There is no alternative.
Margin debt in the stock market has
always been a great indicator of bull
and bear markets. When traders
increase their margin debt, you are in
a bull market, and when it contracts,
you are in a bear market. Well, margin
debt is now down about $60 billion
(end of December) from the peak of
$381 billion in July last year. That’s
an indication of a bear market.
BEWARE! THE SHORT TO INTERMEDIATE TERM
...................Complacency is
still very high. Just watch financial
TV and see all the Wall Street guys,
who have been telling you to bargain
hunting during the entire decline.
They are still talking about the
“bargains.” Of course, the bargains
are getting cheaper and cheaper. You
won’t see a good bottom until there is
actual fear and these people advise to
just “hold but do no new buying.”
Human nature never changes. Emotions
and fundamentals are usually wrong.
You have to look ahead, not at what
earnings and other fundamentals were
in the past year.
The rally so far is weak. That’s a
problem. Conditions are worsening. We
are just a few weeks into the
“recognition phase” of the bear market
and the recession. The bulls are all
hoping for a rally, so they
can raise cash. But “hope” is a very
poor investment tool. In fact, when
you start hoping, it’s the best sell
signal you can get. And that’s what
the majority of money managers will
soon learn.
Bloomberg reports that Goldman Sachs
Group Inc. had its first-quarter
profit estimate cut a hefty 51% by
Fox-Pitt Kelton Cochran Caronia
Waller. The analysts wrote that GS
faces “continued challenges in credit
markets” and may report a $1.7 billion
writedown from leveraged loans. GS
stock is down from 250 in October of
last year to 175 on Feb. 15. That’s
30% in just four months. So much for
being a long-term investor. GS won’t
see that high again for many years.
You can put that forecast in your
trade journal.
Leading U.S. electronics retailer Best
Buy Co. cut its full-year earnings
forecast Friday, citing
weaker-than-expected revenue growth in
January.
Yet, analysts in the media tell us the
“the market is cheap.” But is it?
Actually, it’s far overvalued, as we
have been saying. These analysts are
still using profit forecasts from last
year. But things change. As our
colleague John Mauldin points out, in
January 2007, the earnings forecast
for the S&P 500 index was $89.10 per
share. As we know now, the actual
number for the year was $71.56, a miss
by 20%.
In March of last year, the S&P
earnings forecast was for $92.30 for
2008. At the end of last year, this
forecast was reduced to $83.98. And
now, they are projecting only $71.20.
But for the four quarters ending in
June this year, they are forecasting
only $65.15. We can see that the
expected decline is now running about
35%. And the P/E ratio would be 21.
That’s hardly “cheap.” In fact, it’s
close to what we saw at the bull
market top in the year 2000.
And remember, these are just
forecasts. Everything is deteriorating
much faster than the greater majority
had expected. If the 35% earnings
decline turns into a 50% decline, we
should expect a market decline of a
similar amplitude. Of course, that’s
for the big cap stocks. The small caps
will be decimated. Why? In a
recession, they can’t get bank
loans—and go out of business.

Excerpt from January 7, 2008 Wellington Letter
Bear Market Confirmed!
........
In the meantime, the large financial
firms are rushing to the Middle East
and Asia trying to find capital for
their firms so that the firms don’t
fall below required capital ratios,
which would threaten their very
existence. Much bigger write-downs of
assets held by these firms will occur
in 2008, meaning they need to get even
larger capital infusions than have
been announced.
The world’s greatest credit bubble in
history is imploding. At the same
time, our central bankers, especially
in the U.S., are totally unprepared to
handle it. They have repeatedly shown
over the past 12 months that they do
not even recognize the severity of the
problem, much less come up with a
solution.
And that’s how a financial crisis
evolves and naïve investors are used
to taking stocks off of the hands of
the professionals who don’t want them.
A survey of the biggest money managers
was conducted by CNBC. As you will
see, they don’t share my bearish
opinion.
Only 2% thought the chance of
recession is over 50%.
More than 50% of managers believe the
S&P 500 will finish up at least at 8%
in the coming year,
while financials will be the strongest
sector and materials will be the
weakest. Out of these, 33% said the
index would gain 8%, while 23% expect
a gain of more than 10%.
Well, we shall see. However, history
shows that the majority is usually
wrong.
An old Wall Street rule is that if
January is down, the rest of the year
is down, and if the first week of
January is down, then the entire month
will be down. Furthermore, if the
first day of the year is down, then
chances are high that the week will be
down. So far, it looks like it will be
a down year, according to these rules.
Of course, based on our analysis, we
are very confident that the year will
be down, probably hard.
The market was down in December. If
it’s down in January, it would be the
first time
since
1943 that the market has
been down in both months.

Excerpt from Dec. 14 , 2007 Wellington Letter
THE FED JUST DOESN'T GET IT!
.............................Within 30
minutes, the DJI was down more than
300 points for the day, and about 400
points from the high of the day.
There was an urgent rush to safety,
meaning U.S. Treasury securities,
which we have been recommending since
July. The 10-year T-Note soared, as
its yield plunged below 4%. The 2-Year
T-Note yield plunged below 3%. This
shows a flight from money market funds
to the safety of U.S. Treasury
securities. The big, smart money was
running scared.
We admit that possibly right now the
25 additional point cut would not be
that important. After all, the losses
in the credit markets may be as high
as $500 BILLION, except that the
owners of the paper haven’t admitted
it. The only tool the Fed has to try
to ease the pain is to lower interest
rates substantially. The failure to
act forcefully now sends a very
negative message, namely that the Fed
members are totally out of touch, just
as we have said all year long.
Ultimately, the Fed chairman is
responsible. In August he was
oblivious to the seriousness of the
situation. A meeting with several big
hedge fund managers, x-Treasury
Secretary Rubin, and Hank Paulson woke
him up. But apparently, he went back
to sleep.
He is a timid college professor. His
biggest challenge in the past was in
the classroom. He apparently doesn’t
have the courage, nor the market
knowledge, to handle what we consider
the
largest global credit crunch in the
history of the world.
As the passengers of our economic
ship, we found out today that our
captain is deaf, dumb, and blind. Why
don’t they go out and speak with
business owners, or CEO’s of mid-size
firms? Right now we need someone able
to fix the financial market mess. That
takes the most astute, experienced
individual, and even he might not be
able to do it.
Sorry to be so blunt. But this is no
time for learning on the job.
The morning after the Fed
announcement, before the market
opening, the Fed announced another
bombshell. Here is what we wrote in
our SMARTE TRADER service that day:
The Fed and other central banks got
together before the opening today to
ambush the short sellers. The Fed,
together with the central banks of
Europe, England, Switzerland, and
Britain announced a joint effort to
bring relief to the frozen credit
markets. Even the Bank of Japan and
the Swedish central bank issued
statement supporting the plan.
Unfortunately, the effort will have a
smaller chance than a snow ball not
melting in hell.
The Fed said it would launch a
"temporary term auction facility" that
banks can use to secure loans at its
discount window. There will be two
auctions of up to $20 billion each in
short-term funding next week. The Fed
will open foreign exchange swaps for
up to $20 billion with the European
Central Bank and up to $4 billion with
the Swiss National Bank, whatever that
means. Another $20 billion auction
will be done in January. Well, if you
understand what they are going to do,
then you are smarter than we are.
I just look at the amounts ($20
billion) and the amount of losses the
banks hold on the derivatives, which
is several hundred billion dollars,
and shake my head. The European
Central Bank on certain days has been
putting as much as $100 billion into
the banking system there. How can they
expect these small amounts to work?
It’s a joke.
What should they do? Instead of saying
$20 billion, they should give a huge
number, like $500 billion. That would
restore confidence. Everyone would
know that the $500 billion would not
be used, which is the best part of the
solution. It’s like insurance of your
stock brokerage account up to $10
million, although you may only have
$100,000 there. The much larger amount
gives you confidence.
So, what did the Fed get for its
surprise attack? The DJI was up about
270 points in the first 10 minutes of
trading. From there the index erased
all of its gains, declining 383 points
from the high to a loss of around 111
points, before interventions brought
it back into the black. This action
shows that the big money shares our
negative assessment of the Fed’s move
and took the rally as just another
opportunity to sell short.
Considering that one analyst called
the central bank action “the most
important since 9/11,” the result is
pretty poor. It could be that tomorrow
more buying will come in, but it won’t
be into the financial stocks. By this
time, the big, smart traders realize
that the financial sector dug its own
grave with excessive speculation and
leverage. It had nothing to do with
normal business. Therefore, no one
should feel sorry for these companies.
Now
even the supporters of the Fed chief
say he should leave. Trying to trick
traders and whipsaw them is not the
job of the Fed. They should seek
stability instead of creating
instability, uncertainty, and doubts
about the ability of the Fed to handle
the challenges.
The
Fed is targeting its “Fed Funds rate”
at 4.25% now, but all the government’s
debt instruments, except for the
30-year bonds, have lower interest
rates. This is a very unnatural state
of affairs. The Fed has to get in gear
with market forces. The bulls now talk
about a “soft landing” for the
economy. Yes, and it will be in quick
sand and mud, and possibly a brick
wall after that.
It is now obvious to me that we face a
very long and possibly deep recession.
Furthermore, we will see a bear market
that few think is possible. A 50%
decline in the DJI (from this year’s
high) is a good possibility. But it
will take time.
There will be bank failures, forced
mergers, and governmental bailouts.
Our largest financial institutions
will see significant portions of their
stock owned by foreign entities before
it’s over. The U.S. is now continuing
the path of its long-term decline into
irrelevance, which started in the year
2000. The world’s power will shift to
China in Asia, Russia in Europe, and
the Arab Emirates in the Middle East.
The above is the bad news. The good
news is that although it is beyond our
power to stop big bear markets, we
have always found excellent ways to
prosper from bear markets. And this is
the opportunity we offer to our
subscribers. The next several years
can bring you greater profits than the
bull market of the past 5 years.

THEY DO RING A BELL ,although a little late!
Excerpt from Wellington Letter
December 5,
2007
.........................The rally
from August to October was the
“distribution” rally, which lured the
less sophisticated money managers into
the market, and gave Wall Street the
buyers onto whom they could unload.
This means that from now on there will
be less support for the market. Wall
Street found the “bagholders” and Wall
Street firms are now free to make
money on the short side. In fact, GS
can now become outright bearish in its
forecasts without hurting its own
portfolios.
In the meantime, the Wall Street
people on TV are still bargain
hunting, as they have been doing all
the way down. I prefer not to try to
catch a falling knife. But then, maybe
I am not as smart as they are. But I
don’t use the excuse for losses
either, namely “we are in it for the
next 5-10 years.”
THE STOCK MARKET: Year-end
window-dressing
The bulls are becoming more careful.
Even they are starting to recognize
that there is more to the current
credit market problems than just a few
subprime mortgages blowing up.
The reality is that we are seeing the
greatest credit contraction in the
history of the U.S., one which is
still in the early stages. Credit
contractions are brutal. There is
usually no place to hide, except
ultimately T-bills.
We are now approaching the year end.
This year it will be very volatile,
more than usual. The under performers
will be sold, as no one wants to show
them in their year-end portfolios.
That includes all the financial stocks
and the homebuilders.

Excerpt from Wellington Letter Oct 30,
2007
....................................Treasury
Secretary Paulson just said:
"Yet,
the problem today is
not
limited to subprime
mortgages as the number of homeowners
having trouble making payments on
prime mortgages is also increasing.”
In a speech Monday night, Bernanke
softly echoed this, saying,
"...despite a few encouraging signs,
conditions in the mortgage markets
remain difficult."
Do you see how they try to soften
their assessment of the dismal and
dangerous conditions in the financial
markets?
In the year 2000, the implosion of the
Internet stocks started the bear
market. We heard the same arguments at
that time,
namely that the sector was too small to infect the entire stock market.
At the time that the NASDAQ plunged,
some other stock sectors were
supported for another 10 months,
disguising the big selling in the rest
of the market. As it turned out, the
stock market produced the greatest
wealth devastation in history over the
next 2.8 years.
However, there is another reason for
strength in the tech sector. You see,
many other sectors have exposure to
the subprime and derivative mess,
either directly or indirectly. But
technology is not related to that and
is a purer way to profit from economic
growth without the burdens of the
credit implosion. Tech has been
supporting the market, along with
energy and basic materials. When these
sectors top, then you have to become
very cautious.
Watch
these stocks closely: RIMM, GOOG,
CSCO, HPQ, and AAPL.
Nothing is insolated from a credit
market freeze up over the longer term.
The future’s markets are now
predicting that there is a 100%
likelihood that the Fed will cut rates
at the end of this month (Halloween).
However, last week some analysts said
the Fed might even raise rates. Be
careful how you handle the advise of
‘experts.’ It’s your money. We
predicted without doubt that the Fed
will cut rates. Now we make another
contrarian forecast:
the Fed
will cut rates, but the market will
decline, probably sharply, thereafter.
Why would that happen? The bulls who
suddenly realize that the severe
problems of July have not been
resolved, and have even worsened, will
take any buying surge as the last
opportunity to sell. They can’t easily
sell into a declining market. By the
end of the month, the smarter
investment professionals will be
nervous and will have a sell list
prepared.
The reason that virtually every
analyst is still bullish is strong
economic growth abroad. Yes, U.S.
firms doing business internationally
are reporting great profit and sales
growth, but stagnation in the U.S. As
investors, our decision is whether
U.S. growth is unimportant for the
world, or whether it is. Can we really
assume that a weak U.S. economy or
recession will not drag economies
around the world with it?
The U.S. is about one-third of world
economic activity. The problem we
foresee is the repercussions in China
when U.S. demand suddenly declines by
10%. To the Chinese, that would seem
like a depression.

Excerpt
from the WELLINGTON LETTER, Oct. 15, 07 issue
.......................................The
rally since August was engineered and
manipulated. The volume was much too
low to suggest that it is a normal
continuation of a bull market. A rally
after a plunge on lower volume is the
hallmark of a “secondary top,” which
is then followed by a more serious,
and longer term decline. The “rising
wedge” formations on the charts of
several broad indices are ominous.
The
NASDAQ rising wedge was just
penetrated to the downside, which
strongly suggests that the top is in
place, and that a meaningful decline
is ahead. The prudent investor will
act accordingly.
A major support for the markets in
2007 was the merger & acquisition
game, especially from Private Equity
firms, which bought larger and larger
firms with the debt financing the
banks virtually threw at them. At the
Milken Global Conference early this
year, some of the CEO’s of the major
PE firms said that they had never seen
such easy credit conditions.
One said that if in the morning they
decided they needed $20 billion, they
would have it by the end of the day.
That money was used to buy the stock
of companies they acquired. The
shareholders would get the money, and
plow it back into the stock market.
That game is now over. Suddenly, the
$500 billion injected into the stock
market in this way over the past year
will not be there.
Reality can be postponed, but it can’t
be repealed!

THE FED: SPECULATING ON THE NEXT MOVE
Excerpt
from the WELLINGTON LETTER, Oct. 15, 07 issue
Secondly, money
supply MZM, which now is the broadest
number published has been growing at a
huge 24% annual rate for the past two
month, or by about $250 billion. The
casual analyst says that this is
inflationary. Nonsense! Institutional
money market funds are part of MZM. We
can see that virtually all growth in
MZM is due to Institutional money
market funds. That’s not money
available for economic activity and
most probably not for the stock market
under current conditions. This is
“safe” money.
In the U.S. and
in Europe, the central banks have
thrown hundred of billions into the
financial system in the hope to
unfreeze the credit markets. However,
liquidity is a matter of confidence:
when lenders don’t have confidence to
lend, the money does not go into
economic activity. And that’s what
investors will find out over the next
year. In the first phase of such money
injections, the surplus money into
speculation in the world’s markets.
That’s what we saw since August.
Economists in
the media can’t agree about what the
Fed should do. Some say the Fed should
raise rates in order to support the
dollar, and to slow inflation
pressures. Others say that the Fed
must lower rates further in order to
avoid a recession.
Probably even the
Fed Governors can’t agree on what they
should do at their next meeting. The
Fed says they are “data dependent.”
That means they know as much as we do,
or less. Our motto is that we will
tell you what the Fed will do even
before the Fed knows. And our forecast
is that the Fed will cut rates at the
next meeting.
Some economists
have even criticized the Fed for its
rescue operation in September. Donald
Kohn, the vice-chairman of the Fed
Board, defended the move recently:
"But pending further evidence, a
50-basis-point easing was not an
unreasonable first approximation of
what might be required to keep the
economy on a sustainable growth path."
He added that it was better for the
Fed to respond "too much or too
rapidly" to the turmoil in financial
markets rather than acting "too little
or too slowly."
With recent
favorable inflation news, Kohn said he
believes the Fed could reverse the
recent rate cut if it turned out to be
larger than needed.
Those are very
reasonable statements. He is totally
right that the Fed had to act
energetically before things got
totally out of control. Hopefully he
can convince some of the other Fed
Board members.
The Fed meets at the end of this month
for two days, ending on Halloween. How
appropriate! They will cut rates 25
points, but that will be greeted with
a market decline if the market follows
the pattern of 2001.

BEAR MARKET!
Excerpt from the WELLINGTON
LETTER, Aug. 6, 07 issue
....................................On
Saturday, one editor of a major financial publication said
that investors should not worry. He said he stayed invested
during the 1987 crash, almost panicked, but eventually stocks
got back. And in the year 2000, he stayed invested, and
eventually stocks came back. Well, if your investments
strategy is to stay with an 80% wipeout as in 2000-20002, then
you better have a rich sugar daddy.
What’s worrisome to us is that there
|