|

Continue from the home page..........
(By Bert Dohmen , May 4, 2010)
NEAR TERM: CORRECTION TIME!
In our
SMARTE TRADER of last Friday we
recommended closing out all long
positions on Monday (yesterday) near
the close of the day. Our signals were
not yet conclusive, but we prefer
being a little early rather than being
too late. It turned out to be a good
trading move.
For new
subscribers, in our issue of April
26 we showed two charts, one of
the S&P 500 and that of the NASDAQ.
We wrote the following:
The
S&P 500 INDEX (weekly) chart is long
term. It shows the big bear market.
Notice the rally from last year’s
bottom has now retraced a Fibonacci
61.8%. It is right there now. This is
normally strong resistance. It should
at least cause a pullback, or even a
correction. In that case, we would
look for first support in the 50%
area, now at 112, which equates to
1120 on the S&P 500 index.
The
S&P 500 INDEX (weekly)
%20(weekly).jpg)
The
NASDAQ COMPOSITE (weekly) chart shows
the stellar rally in this index, much
stronger than the other indices. It
had the late January decline when all
stocks plunged, but that was over in
about 3 weeks. Now the index is at an
even stronger resistance level. We
would be very surprised if there
wouldn’t be a correction from here.
The unknown is whether it’s just a
pullback, or a potentially painful
correction. A 10% correction would
be normal. But it could be deeper.
The
NASDAQ COMPOSITE (weekly)
%204-26-2010.jpg)
CONCLUSION: Although the
markets look OK on a fundamental basis
until late this year, the way the
markets are refueled is through scary
pullbacks. That generates new buying
power and attracts new money from the
sidelines. The perfect time for that
may be near. …Active traders will have
some good trading opportunities.
So
far, that was right on target. In
fact, the date of that issue, April
26, was the exact day of the 13 months
rally so far.

WILL STOCKS BECOME AN INFLATION
HEDGE?
(By Bert Dohmen , April 9, 2010)
........
Our contrarian view in 1978 was that
without tight money, inflation
pressures would cause a flight of
money out of bonds into stocks. After
all, businesses can raise prices to
offset rising cost pressures as long
as the economy doesn’t falter. And
that’s the key.
Our view was totally unorthodox and
greeted with great skepticism, to say
the least. But it turned out to be
correct. Inflation and interest rates
rose to double-digit levels, but
stocks continued to rise until Miller
was “retired” and Paul Volcker came
in. This was very unusual, because P/E
ratios compress during times of
sharply rising interest rates.
Currently, in spite of the Fed’s
obvious efforts to reduce its
multi-trillion dollar bailout
programs, the Fed will stand by with
the money pump should there be any
problems. This gives us a return to
the “Greenspan put,” which we now call
the “Bernanke put.” In other words, as
investors, you can be comfortable to
know that the Fed and Washington will
prevent any new disaster, at least
until November.
This also increases appetite for risk,
similar to the environment in
2006-2007. You see, when risk is
artificially removed, risk taking
increases. So far this year, $91
billion in junk bonds have been
issued. The yield spread between junk
and Treasuries is now at the lowest
level since December 2007.
There is also a boom in “reverse
convertible notes” being sold to
investors who don’t even understand
what these are. The yield is
extraordinarily high the first few
months and drops. Most investors will
probably lose money on these. The
gambling spirit is coming back.
Apparently the fear of risk is
disappearing.
Although our view is that we are in a
long-term deflationary environment,
such periods are often interrupted
with shorter term inflation burst. We
had that in the first half of 2008 as
commodity prices soared before they
collapsed. The U.S. budget deficit
will probably add an unimaginable
$20 trillion of debt over the next 10
years. That much debt cannot be
financed. Therefore, the only
alternative is to try to inflate it
away. China has already hinted
that they think this is the game plan
in Washington.
As a result, there are two huge
opposing forces: a deflationary
crumbling debt pyramid and double
digit declines in credit opposed by
the need to finance trillions of
dollars of deficits, which produces
periodic inflation pressures as the
debt is “monetized.” Investors cannot
take the “long term” approach in such
an environment. But it’s ideal for
traders. And that’s what we do in our
trading services, SMARTE TRADER and
our FEARLESS ETF & INDEX TRADER.
Wishing you successful trading,
Bert Dohmen

IN 2010: DON’T CONFUSE MINI-BUBBLES
WITH REALITY
(article by BERT DOHMEN, EDITOR of Bert Dohmen’s WELLINGTON LETTER
(12-28-09)
..............As a result, the financial system is flush
with cash which is not being used for
economic activity. Therefore, the
capital is used for speculation,
similar to what produced the financial
crisis in the first place. The
carry-trade is a favorite speculation
once again: cheap US dollars are
borrowed at 0.25% and reinvested in
governmental bonds of higher-yielding
countries at perhaps 5-8% with great
leverage, perhaps as much as 100:1.
This is a great way to make money,
until the currency trends change. If
the dollar rate increases by just 1%,
with that leverage all the equity
would be wiped out. If the bank has
those losses, the taxpayers will
probably get the losses, while the
banks’ trading operations got the
prior profits.
With the declining US dollar in 2009, it was more
attractive to buy shares in companies
which at least have a chance to grow
profits, even if sales don’t grow,
then just buy money market funds. In
effect, stocks became a hedge against
the depreciating value of the
currency. In 2010, investors may turn
out to be wrong when profits follow
sales downward and the dollar rises in
value. A rising dollar would turn the
tide for many currently most popular
investments, such as commodities,
emerging markets, etc.
Although a steep yield curve traditionally has
meant a good economic recovery was
ahead, this time there are many
obstacles to a recovery. Higher taxes,
and promises of even more taxes in the
years ahead, make business creation a
game of “hope over experience.” A
flight away from the questionable
policies of a U.S. Congress, which
threaten to destroy the U.S. economic
system, is already occurring. U.S.
companies are moving abroad because
the writing is on the wall. Success
will be punished in the U.S.
The “trader tax” proposal, thought to be dead earlier this
year, is gaining traction again as
Washington desperately looks for new
sources of revenues. It would impose a
tax on every stock market transaction.
It would destroy the U.S. financial
markets. Trading would move off-shore.
But politicians are usually oblivious
to the reality of the market place.
BOTTOMLINE: The excess liquidity spilling over into the
investment markets has produced the
illusion of a new bull market. But
it’s just plain speculation. Once the
Fed starts reducing the stimulus, or
the perception is that the Fed will
act, reality will return.
The markets in 2010 will bounce between disillusionment
about economic reality and liquidity
injections by the Fed. Another crisis
will be averted, but significant parts
of the economy will be totally under
the control of Washington. This
suggests that there will be no
economic recovery, just long-term
stagnation, shrinkage of business
enterprises, insufficient job
creation, and continued loan
contractions.
The Dubai and Greek financial crises are the “canaries in
the mine” confirming that all the
rescue efforts of major central banks
around the world have been
insufficient to stop the crumbling of
the global debt pyramid. It will be
important not to confuse new
mini-bubbles created by the central
banks with genuine, sustainable
economic growth
Traders will have great opportunities, will the “buy and
hold” investors will continue to face
the same difficulties as the have over
the past 10 years during which the
major indices actually lost money. It
has been the lost decade.

GOLD
September 14, 2009
.......... Below is a
chart of the seasonal behavior of gold
(courtesy of Moore Research Center.)
This chart basically adds the change
of gold for each specific time period
during the year over a number of
years. The dotted graph is for the
last 15 years, and the solid line is
the last 34 years. Note that the
seasonal tendencies are pretty similar
for both.

The chart shows that starting with
September, there is typically a very
strong rise in the yellow metal. This
is due to several factors: European
gold manufacturers, primarily Italian,
go back to work after a summer
vacation. Yes, they get multi-months
of vacation. Obviously they are much
smarter than we Americans.
The Christmas holiday season in
western countries produces demand for
jewelry. And then we have the wedding
season starting in India. Gold and
silver are the traditional gifts. In
other words, the demand increases.
That usually leads to higher prices.
GOLD
HEDGES ARE ABANDONED:
Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX) just
made a public offering of stock for
approximately $3.0 billion
representing 81.2 million common
shares of Barrick at a price of $36.95
per share.
About $2.9 billion will be used to
eliminate its gold hedges. Here is the
real reason: the company announced
that a $5.6 billion charge to
earnings will be recorded in the third
quarter as a result of a change in
accounting treatment for the
contracts. This is apparently the loss
the firm had on its hedges. No wonder
they decided to liquidate them. They
couldn't stand the pain any longer.
You can bet that as the price of gold
continues to march upward, more and
more hedges will be abandoned. That
creates more demand for gold. One
major source could be an unwinding of
the "gold leasing" programs. This is
huge. For several decades, central
banks would "lease" gold to the
so-called bullion banks at very low
rates, such as 1%. The bullion banks
would sell the gold and invest the
proceeds in government bonds at a
higher rate of interest. It was a very
profitable game.
But it also created a virtual, huge
short position in gold. No one knows
the exact amount, but it’s in the
billions. The bullion banks still owe
the gold to the central banks and will
either have to buy it back, or use
options as hedges. The latter is too
expensive in a bull market. Once the
bullion banks can no longer keep the
price of gold down through
manipulations, they will have to buy
it back.
Many people think that a rise in the
price of gold is synonymous with
inflation. Actually, there is very
little correlation. Our work suggests
that gold reacts bullishly to fears of
governments monetizing the debt even
if the inflationary impact doesn't
show up for many years. And
there you have the real bullish story
on gold.
IS
IT STILL A BEAR MARKET RALLY?
August 24, 2009
...............
But
"distribution" processes can last for several months. In 2007,
the first top occurred in July, which we called perfectly. The
market corrected. Then there was a rally off of the bottom in
August. The indices made slightly higher highs in October
2007. We caught that top within two days. As it turned out, it
was the 5 year bull market top. But at that point, the
majority of stocks did not make new highs, meaning they had
been under "distribution."
In past issues we have
enumerated all the terrible
fundamentals for the global economies,
the $50-$60 trillion Mt. Everest of
debt denominated in dollars, the fact
that the banking system currently has
a much higher leverage than at the
peak in 2007, the fact that corporate
earnings and sales have plunged, etc.
But the stock market keeps rising.
So, we have to think, what could be
the reason. Here are several possible
reasons:
1. In a low volume,
summer trading market, it's easy
to squeeze the early short sellers who
are using good analysis and realize
that stocks are much too expensive.
This is the game of the big trading
operations.
2. It behooves trading
firms like Goldman to lure people back
into the markets, as that enables
companies to issue more stock
(secondary offerings), which Goldman
underwrites. It also enables mergers &
acquisitions, and all types of money
raising efforts. Therefore, more risk
taking helps their business.
4. The government wants
to encourage a strong stock market.
The "President's Working Group on the
Financial Markets," (use google.com)
established after the 1987 market
crash, has the power to intervene
whenever there is a strong decline.
However, currently it may have
expanded that authority to actually
produce a market rally, all in the
interests of "preserving orderly
markets."
BOTTOMLINE: If you
agree with us that the greatest
financial crisis and wealth
destruction, at least since the Great
Depression, and possibly in the
history of the nation, cannot be
resolved with an 8 month recession,
than you will not be convince by the
Wall Street hype that this is a new
bull market.

By Bert Dohmen August 4, 2009
Expect: Big Rebound in GDP to be
followed by "Double-dip"
..........
However, investors must recognize that
this period of "green shoots" and
"rosy scenario" will be followed by
another decline into recession in
2010.
What
are the reasons for a relapse into
recession next year? A multitude! But
here are some of the important ones:
1.
Tax
hikes on the producers of society, the
people who start companies and create
jobs. With the current policies coming
out of Washington, an entrepreneur has
to be extremely bored and dimwitted to
start a new firm.
2.
If
nationalized health care becomes a
reality, the above is amplified.
3.
The "Cap
and Trade" is a multi-trillion dollar
tax on everyone for the benefit of a
few. It's a result of the greatest
hoax in the history of mankind,
"global warming produced by man."
4.
The
global crisis was caused by excessive
debt. The bailouts have not reduced
debt, but only shifted it, from the
private sector to the public sector.
5.
The only
deleveraging has been in the hedge
fund sector. In many other sectors,
including banks, leverage is now
greater than before the near meltdown
of 2008.
6.
There is
no credit expansion, the type of
credit that produces economic growth,
such as Commercial & Industrial Loans.
Without credit expansion, there is no
sustainable recovery.
7.
Jobs,
jobs, jobs. Without job creation, how
long can any recovery last?
The
most important thing for investors is
to differentiate between the
short-to-intermediate term and the
long term. This is critical. Over the
intermediate term, psychology, false
perceptions, market manipulations, and
talk in Washington determine the
markets. Over the long term,
reality prevails.
It takes two quarters
of positive GDP growth to mark the
"end of a recession." We may have that
early next year.
The surprise however
may be that similar to the Japanese
experience, the economy will drop
right back into recession thereafter.
The tax hikes and the expiration of
the Bush tax cuts will virtually
assure that.
In
the meantime, the average person will
be led to believe that the greatest
global financial crisis in history is
over, after only 18 months. The
investor is being convinced that the
crisis that almost caused a meltdown
of the global financial system,
destroyed well over $60 TRILLION in
wealth, produced real estate crashes
globally, reduced trade by 30-45%,
virtually shut down the credit
markets, is still curtailing credit
for businesses, caused 30 million
people in the U.S. to be unemployed or
underemployed, and caused the demise
of financial institutions which had
survived every depression and crisis
of the last 150 years, is now over.
How
easy the recession was! Many people I
know felt no pain at all. So now, I
guess we can start borrowing,
spending, and speculating again. After
all, even a newsmagazine told us that
the recession is over. But life is not
that easy.
As
investors, we must take it one step at
a time. You must look at the charts in
order to differentiate between hype in
the media and reality. Currently, with
the S&P 500 at 1000, the index is only
4.4% above the high of almost two
months earlier. But looking at all
euphoria in the media, one would think
that this is a rip-roaring bull
market.
Although the long term looks poor, the
intermediate term looks more
promising. The next years will be the
years for traders, not the "buy and
hold" investor. Visit our website.
STOCK MARKET: BEAR MARKET RALLY
PHASE II
.........
The
bulls tell you that banks have raised
billions of dollars to shore up their
capital. However, the money raised by
banks was by way of "secondary"
offerings, i.e. companies selling more
of their stock. Most of these stock
offerings were below market price,
meaning that existing shareholders
were diluted. Apparently, they didn't
complain too much as survival was at
stake. In other words, the firms had
to offer a great bargain to attract
the money. To me, that's like car
dealers offering big discounts: they
lose money on each car sold, but they
hope to make it up later with the
"servicing."
Most
of the rally since early March, when
we gave our "buy" signal on the exact
day of the low, has been caused by
expectations that the economy will
recover this year. We said the
strength of the rally would even
surprise some of the bulls and could
go into August of the year. It was
simple: the compression in prices had
gone to an extreme. It was like a
spring compressed to the maximum. The
rebound is mechanical, not
fundamental.
The
bulls now tell you that the markets
are forecasting a recovery. But
markets act on "expectations" which
are often totally wrong. Take the bull
market top in October of 2007. Were
the expectations that the "subprime
mortgage crisis" would not infect the
markets correct? Did that last rally
"predict" a great economy in 2008? The
fact is that the markets are wrong
about half of the time.
In June, we wrote that
our indicators were signaling a market
correction, we also wrote:
"we don't expect a big
plunge in the market during the
summer, but rather a lot of back and
forth. The summer market is being
driven by the "black boxes," i.e.
computer trading."
These "black box
programs" trade against the emotions
of the average traders. They may
change positions several or many times
in a day. They don't care about
economic statistics or fundamentals,
except as a way to benefit by going
against the traditional emotional
response of the average trader. When
traders buy based on some positive
news item, these programs go against
that response by shorting against the
initial response. It's a fact that the
emotional response fades out quickly
and then the markets, sectors,
indices, or stocks go back to the
trendline.
We have been talking
about 60% of the daily stock volume
coming from these operations. Our
respected colleague, John Mauldin, and
his Wall Street contacts say it's
closer to 70-80%. Wow! That's
incredible. In other words, actual
investment buying of stocks has
virtually dried up. And so has
liquidity. This doesn't happen in
normal bear markets.
Much of the trading now
is "high frequency." The "black boxes"
try to make as little as 50 cents per
share on a trade, but they do it a
thousand times a day. I see it in my
own trading every day and I am trying
to exploit that to my advantage.
Read this again so that
it sinks in. This market rally has
nothing to do with fundamentals. In
fact, our view is that it is once
again an engineered rally which
eventually will end in a big trap for
all the bulls. On July 31 the S&P 500
index was only 4.3% above the May 7
level, almost 3 months prior. Yes, the
euphoria in the financial media makes
it seem as if this were a rip-roaring
bull market. Enthusiasm is getting too
frothy. Whenever that happens, it's
good to take some chips off of the
table.

THE "REFLATION TRADE" HAS REPLACED THE "ARMAGEDDON TRADE"
By
Bert Dohmen,
June 25, 2006
.............
Since early March this year, the Armageddon
Trade has been replaced by the "Reflation Trade." The
financial markets have begun to function again to a certain
degree. Credit spreads have shrunk, some bank lending is
taking place, the Fed is buying or guaranteeing commercial
paper, supporting that important market, banks are able to
issue debt with governmental guarantees, and the Fed is
willing to accept everything but the proverbial kitchen sink
as collateral for loans. In other
words, the world has retreated from the abyss.
THE REFLATION TRADE:
The massive liquidity
injections have produced a new trade,
the "Reflation Trade," based on
expectations of high future inflation.
There is now a flight toward
commodities, away from defensive
investments, and away from T-bonds.
Now the investment world is prepared
for a new bull market in stocks, a
period of high inflation, and a
commodity boom. We believe some of
these trades will work, such as gold,
silver, and short selling long-term
T-bonds. But a general commodity boom
will take a long time.
Some analysts even talk
about "hyperinflation." Well, I
studied the hyperinflation that
occurred in Germany’s Weimar Republic
90 years ago. It takes a long time to
develop, if it ever does. It takes
incredible distortions of the
financial system to materialize. There
are different steps in the process.
The first part has the velocity of
money plunging which means there is
little demand for the money the Fed is
injecting. That's happening now.
Prices plunge as well as consumer
spending plunges (see chart below).


Obviously, there is no
sign of inflation here. So, anyone who
bets on inflation may have to wait a
few years, or longer.
The next phase in the
process for very high inflation can
occur if the value of the currency
plunges because confidence in the
government’s policies has plunged.
That's when money velocity speeds up
because consumers spend money as fast
as received because they fear the loss
of purchasing power. It also causes
interest rates to soar, as lenders
want to be compensated for the loss of
purchasing power. This is when gold
and silver skyrocket. But that takes a
long time to develop. It doesn't occur
while the
"great deleveraging" is still going
on.
While this is
happening, the central bank, in the
U.S. it’s the Fed, will cause gigantic
swings in the financial markets as it
fights these ominous trends. It's a
very hazardous time for investors.
The past three months
analysts have been hyping the
reflation trade, recommending
commodity related assets. They are
expecting a global economic recovery
and rebound in the demand of basic
materials.
We would take the
opposite side of that trade. Our work
strongly suggests that we are in long
term, economic shrinking process.
Demand for commodities will continue
to erode, slowly but surely. Look at
this chart of the CRB Commodity Index.
It is heavily weighted towards
agricultural commodities, but it shows
that perhaps the commodity frenzy is
over hyped.
The
markets often act on "anticipation" of
the future. However, these
expectations are often wrong. When the
market finally recognizes that, you
have severe corrections.

MUSTARD SEEDS or
TERMINAL VELOCITY?
June 9, 2009
...........But
just because acceleration declines,
doesn't mean that the deterioration is
over. Instead, I call it "terminal
velocity." When someone jumps from
the Empire State building, his
acceleration stops at a "terminal
velocity" of about 123 mph, i.e. the
rate of descent no longer accelerates.
But when he hits the sidewalk, he
still going 123 mph and goes "splat."
All these green shoots
will wither in the wind later this
year for lack of water, i.e., credit
and corporate profits. And the few
profits that will be made will be
taxed away.
But for now, the "REFLATION"
trade is alive. The game of money
managers right now is to bet on a
global economic recovery, which will
increase demand for materials, energy,
etc. However, money managers are very
often wrong. They are often forced to
get into positions in order not to
miss a move, After all, they are being
paid to invest. If they miss a
meaningful move, they may get fired,
or lose a lot of clients. So they
plunge in, even if they don't trust
the move.
We had a" reflation"
rally in 2008. It ended in early
September. The popular sentiment about
reflation was wrong. In fact, that's
when deflation really got going. The
market doesn't tell you anything about
the future, just about the lemming
response of the participants.
With the global
economies withering, there is cost
cutting everywhere. No one needs large
stockpiles of anything. Only China is
buying, but their infrastructure is
about 100 years behind most
industrialized countries. They can now
put all the stimulus money into
catching up. But that won't be enough
to pull the global economies out of
recession. Remember, China's entire
economy is only 25% of the size of the
U.S. economy.
BOTTOMLINE:
Our view is that all the theories
behind the current rallies are wrong
and will be proven wrong by the fall
of the year. The smoke and mirrors
games played in Washington have for
now calmed the fears of a global
financial meltdown. That's what is
really behind the rally: the "end of
the world" fear is dissipating. But
all the other problems remain, which
will now get the attention again.
The next bear market
phase is when poor economic conditions
come to the forefront. It's one thing
to rescue the banking system, but a
totally different thing to engineer an
economic recovery when credit creation
has plunged by trillions of dollars
and tax burdens are soaring. There is
just "no gasoline in the tank" to fuel
a recovery at this time. And
Washington tax policies will assure
that any little spark of recovery will
quickly be extinguished by higher
taxes.
Bert Dohmen
June 8, 2009... BEAR
MARKET RALLY, NOT A NEW BULL MARKET
..........
The bulls say that we
have already seen the equivalent of
the 1932 bottom. To me, that seems
improbable. At the 1932 bottom, the
DJI had lost 89%. Therefore, the
bottom this March doesn't qualify as
"the bottom" at all. In fact, given
that we had the greatest speculative
bubble of modern times, using the
highest degree of leverage, and
creating $1.2 quadrillion of
derivatives, the final bear market
bottom should be much, much lower.
At minimum, the economic contraction
will be much longer. We expect it to
last at least until 2017, of course
with periodic fools rallies.
The Great Depression
bear market bottom was three years
after the prior bull market top. That
would give us at the earliest a bottom
in 2010. But remember, the 1932 bottom
didn't end the depression.
Stock prices could make
a higher bottom next year than we
anticipate IF inflation starts rising
strongly. Then stock prices would rise
in nominal terms, but not in
inflation-adjusted terms. In other
words, the value of the currency
declines and stocks become a hedge
against the declining purchasing power
of the currency. With the massive
money creation we are seeing, this is
a possibility.
In our view, we are
currently seeing a typical bear market
r ally. In the last bear market that
started in March 2000, there was a
rally late in the year going into
January 2001. Many high-profile
analysts proclaimed it to be the start
of the new bull market and advised
"loading up the truck." We gave a new
sell signal late in January. That was
right on target. And that's when the
decline got serious.
In early March, when we
called the temporary bottom, we said
the rally may go into late summer but
it would be very volatile. We don't
have a crystal ball, but depend on our
indicators to give us the clues when.
If there is another rally attempt in
the summer, it would be to trap all
the hopeful bulls. It would present
another great opportunity to sell
short.
Sentiment right now is
virtually "giddy" amongst the analysts
and commentators in the media. The
bullish consensus of index traders is
now at the level last seen at the bull
market top in October 2007.
Furthermore, the
selling of stocks versus buying of
corporate insiders, the people who
know how their business is likely to
be over the next year, is at one of
the highest levels on record. The
sell/buy ratio is over 8, meaning that
for every share purchased, they have
sold eight. Obviously, they are not
that optimistic.
The global financial
crisis was caused by an implosion of
excessive debt, due to uncredibly high
leverage employed by financial
institutions. The government is trying
to resolve the excessive debt problem
by creating more debt. That just won't
work. Be prepared.
Bert Dohmen
June 7, 2009....
PROFITS
OR ACCOUNTING MANEUVERS?
..........
And it doesn't
stop there. Most banks have sold bonds in past years to raise
capital. Those bonds may have declined significantly in value
because of loss of confidence in the viability of the banks. If a
bond has declined 40% in value, the bank may now book that 40%
decline as a profit! How is that possible? Well, the accounting
theory is that a bank could theoretically buy those bonds back
today, and thus reduce the debt obligation by that 40%. Once again,
it books a multi-billion-dollar profit.
That's how Citigroup
turned a $2.8 billion loss into a
$1.6 billion reported profit. Wonders
never cease. Over the next several
quarters, we will see more
"manufactured earnings" by banks. The
unknown is how the stock will react to
this? Will investors realize that they
are being fooled?
For now, we should not
be too fast at writing the epitaph of
the large banks. They have many things
in their favor now. That's why they
are able to raise billions of new
capital, almost overnight. That's a
huge change from the frozen credit
markets of the past 20 months.
One great program for
the large banks is the TLGP, which
very few people have heard of.
Financial institutions have been able
to borrow money from the government at
less than 2% by the billions. When
they lend this out at 8%-28%, it
obviously helps profits. What is this
program?
Late last year, the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
started its Temporary Liquidity
Guarantee Program (TLGP). This
program guarantees newly issued senior
unsecured debt of banks, thrifts, and
certain holding companies, and
provides full coverage of
non-interest-bearing deposit
transaction accounts. The FDIC first
adopted the program on Oct. 13.
Recently, banks have been taking
advantage of it to raise billions of
dollars. Some of the large banks have
borrowed $20 or $30 billion under this
program, much more than they got from
the TARP.
Bottomline:
Most of the focus of the government
action has been on preventing a
meltdown of the banking system.
Therefore, this is probably the one
sector in the economy that is safe for
now. But that doesn't mean earnings
growth. Most other sectors are still
vulnerable to the long-term
deterioration of the economy, and thus
shrinking or disappearing profits.
That's where investors will be trapped
for the next many years.

SHOCK AND AWE
from WASHINGTON
Excerpt from March 24, Wellington
Letter
.............................................$300
billion will be used to buy
longer-term Treasury bonds. As a
result, yields plunged as bond prices
soared. The Fed will widen the types
of securities it will accept as
collateral for loans. That means the
kind of stuff no one can sell. But it
helps. The Fed will also buy another
$100 billion of agency debt, bringing
that total to $200 billion.
Another $750 billion will be used to
buy "agency" mortgage-backed
securities. That means FNMA and
Freddie Mac securities. A lot of these
are held by insurance firms, regional
banks, and Sovereign Wealth Funds.
They have all been complaining that
they got stuck with this paper when
the government took these firms over.
The Fed’s move is a way to reduce the
complaints.
All together, that's a huge amount of
additional money, especially
considering that the Fed’s new TAFT
program started last week and is
outside the purview of today's
announcement.
Also on Monday, (March 23, 2009), the
U.S. Treasury announced a plan to take
bad assets out of the banking system
with the help of private investors.
It's a complicated plan and there are
obstacles. Treasury estimates that the
plan will take $1 trillion of assets
out of financial firms and thus enable
banks to start lending. You can read
all the details on the internet. In my
view, the plan is so convoluted and
full of question marks, that in the
end, it will not bring the desired
results. The stock market celebrated
the announcement, but that's more hope
than brains.
Treasury Secretary Geithner believes
that this will encourage banks to
start lending again. Well, banks are
lending right now, but they are being
much more careful. They lack of
lending standards will not be seen
again for a long time. Banks are now
going back to basics.
Furthermore, the $1 trillion of the
Treasury plan is a band-aid. About six
weeks ago we discussed the fact that
only about $1.1 trillion of bad assets
had so far been realized, but that the
actual amount in the system, according
to Bridgewater Associates, is 5 times
greater, i.e. over $5 trillion. That
means that this current program will
have to be followed up with additional
money, much more, in fact, than has
been announced.
The Fed announcements will rekindle
some optimism. Last week Fed chief Ben
Bernanke made it clear that he is in
charge. The U.S. Treasury action on
Monday may diffuse some of the calls
for the resignation of Timothy
Geithner, the Treasury Secretary. For
a while, the markets will trade on
that hope. But eventually, reality
will return when it is found that the
desired results are just not coming.
The plan does nothing for the economy.
We have to consider that it was a
financial crisis which produced the
current economic crisis. But over the
next several years, it will be the
economic crisis which will produce
continued deterioration in the
financial sector.
THE BEST BEAR MARKET RALLY YET:
..................In our last issue,
we wrote: "We believe that the markets
are now in a bear market rally phase.
The
economy will also show some better
numbers in the spring and early
summer. All trends consist of
shorter-term cycles, even crises,
meltdowns, and depressions. The TALF
program will inject several hundred
billion dollars into the system. That
will loosen credit conditions to a
certain extent, temporarily."
The rally got into high gear with the
Fed statement after its latest meeting
on March 18. Now we have to guess how
long the rally will last and how high
it will go. Late last week, the market
had a two-day pullback. That's a
normal technical pullback. On Friday
we wrote that, “… the market must
rally on Monday and stay above that
trendline.”
Well, the DJI gained 497 points today
(Monday, March 23). That's almost 7%!
That's extraordinary!
As we wrote in our SMARTE TRADER
service, as well as in PRIVATE
PORTFOLIOS, this bear market rally is
likely to be more substantial than
what we have seen previously. All of
our technical indicators are now lined
up. The two-day pullback last Thursday
and Friday brought a lot of worries to
the bulls. But our S&P 500 chart
suggested that it was just a pullback
and that a rally today, Monday, would
be very bullish if it occurred. It
did!
The close in the S&P 500 in the 823
area is very positive. The index had
resistance at 802. Early this morning,
in an email, I speculated that the
index would leap over that resistance
and continue to rise. It did! This is
bullish confirmation of the strength
of this rally.
The short sellers are now being forced
to close out short positions, which is
adding fuel to the fire.
CONCLUSION:
After 15 months of gloom and doom,
sentiment is ready for a turn to the
positive. It's spring, the sun is out,
and the warmth from the sun will bring
renewed optimism. Everything had been
severely compressed to the downside in
late February. The break in the major
indices to new bear market lows at
that time normally would have brought
a big decline. The fact that this
didn't occur tells us that the market
was sold out. When a market doesn't
decline much on bad news, and when
numerous stocks actually rise on bad
news, as we witnessed, it is always a
bullish sign.
This is a time to participate in a
good bear market rally.

GOLD: A "KEY REVERSAL" DAY
By Bert Dohmen March 2009
.......
With the financial stocks rallying strongly,
the "safe haven" money that went into gold is leaving. That
causes lower prices for a short period. But then comes the
"inflation hedge" trade, and that involves much more money
than the "safe haven" trade. Therefore, a pullback in gold
when the financials are strong should not cause concern.
The big, smart hedge funds are putting big
money into the gold sector. John Paulson, whose huge hedge
fund made billions betting against subprime mortgages, paid
$1.28 billion for an 11% stake in AngloGold Ashanti Ltd., one
of the world's largest gold miners. The Paulson Group manages
about $30 billion. It profited nicely from the subprime
crisis. Its main fund was up 37% last year while the average
hedge fund lost 19%. The Paulson funds also own about 28
million shares of Kinross Gold Corp., or about 4%.
Eton Park Capital Management LP, Greenlight
Capital Inc., and Hayman Advisors LP have all made big
investments in this sector.
The CEO of AngloGold Ashanti said: “As the
world deals with the global economic crisis, the value of
gold, as the only true ‘hard currency,’ is coming to the fore
as evidenced by the investment choices of some of the world's
most seasoned investors.”

WHAT IS "CAP and TRADE?"
From Stratford;
Cap and Trade Program
......
Establishing a
national standard for a cap and trade system would allow utility
companies to factor in future costs of emitting greenhouse gases,
which currently is an unknown. Utility companies do not know whether
it makes sense to build regular coal plants, clean coal plants,
solar or wind installations or natural gas production facilities
because the rules of the game are not set. Until that happens,
energy expansion in the United States will be at a standstill.
However, the
U.S. domestic climate-change policy must be negotiated at the global
level, particularly with China. Obama, or any subsequent U.S.
president, will be hard-pressed to adopt carbon emission rules
without first getting some sort of a deal with China that would
guarantee that Beijing would also address its own greenhouse
emissions. Otherwise, U.S. greenhouse gas-emitting industries
(chemicals, petrochemical, paper and pulp, steel, cement, etc.)
could bolt for China and the developing world.
Therefore, a
conversation with Beijing about climate change is high on Obama's
list of priorities; his energy envoy, Todd Stern, is accompanying
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on her current trip to East Asia,
primarily to discuss some of Obama's energy ideas with the Chinese.
This is how the Wall Street Journal explains the effect of the
"cap and trade" tax which will give every American, not just
taxpayers, a huge tax increase. However, supporters point out that
it only effects people who use energy, such as gasoline, heat for
their homes, electricity, etc.
Politicians
love cap and trade because they can claim to be taxing "polluters,"
not workers. Hardly. Once the government creates a scarce new
commodity -- in this case the right to emit carbon -- and then
mandates that businesses buy it, the costs would inevitably be
passed on to all consumers in the form of higher prices. Stating the
obvious, Peter Orszag -- now Mr. Obama's budget director -- told
Congress last year that "Those price
increases are essential to the success of a cap-and-trade program."
Hit hardest
would be the "95% of working families" Mr. Obama keeps mentioning,
usually omitting that his no-new-taxes pledge comes with the caveat
"unless you use energy." Putting a price on carbon is regressive by
definition because poor and middle-income households spend more of
their paychecks on things like gas to drive to work, groceries or
home heating.
You can escape
the tax if you don't use energy. Try that!

A "BAD BANK" for BAD ASSETS?
The Size of the Problem
Excerpt
from the Wellington Letter, Feb. 23, 2009
.....
In the meantime, another
huge bill, the so-called "Stimulus Bill," was passed by the
House, and is now going through the Senate. It will be around
$900 billion and won't do a thing for the economy. This is a
garbage collection of all the pet projects their sponsors
couldn't get through under the old Administration. If this is
the promised "change," I don't want it.
Nevertheless, let's assume they find another "band aid"
solution, and a way to implement a "bad bank" plan. That would
prevent an imminent plunge in the bank stocks for a little
while. But for how long? Nothing they did last year
worked.
In my book,
PRELUDE TO MELTDOWN, written in late 2007, I said that the
coming meltdown would be so large that it was highly
questionable whether the U.S. government, together with the
central banks of the world, would be able to prevent the
meltdown. Originally, the official estimate was that the
entire bad asset problem would be around $125 billion. Then
the forecasts were raised to $400 billion. I wrote last year,
that when everything is done, it could approach 10-$20
trillion.
Now Goldman Sachs forecasts that troubled
assets could exceed $5 trillion.
That is just over 40% of the $12.3 trillion in
total assets of U.S. commercial banks. Imagine, just 18 months
ago they were talking about $125 billion. That's 40 times
bigger than the official estimate in 2007.
You see, I
was counting the Credit Default Swaps, which a year ago
amounted to $65 trillion. The implosion of these triggered the
bailout of AIG. Currently, it is estimated these have shrunk
to $30 trillion, still a huge amount. This unregulated market
should never have been allowed for speculation. Another
Washington failure.
Just look at the current leverage: Citigroup
and Bank of America have $3.8 trillion of assets between them.
An "asset" for a bank is a loan it has made. Citigroup has a
capitalization of $19 billion, and B of A has about $31
billion. That's a capitalization of
$50 billion supporting $3.8 TRILLION of loans. That's leverage
of 131 to 1.
It's
obvious that the taxpayer will be the big sucker again.
Somebody has to hold all these worthless assets, and it will
be the taxpayer. He will get trillions of dollars of bad
assets. And then he will get a tax hike to boot to pay for it
all. As a taxpayer, be sure to say "thank you."
I propose
as an encore, a "Really Bad Bank (RBB)." This would be for all
investors who listened to their brokers and made bad
investments, in mutual funds, stocks, junk bonds, muni-bonds,
etc. They would be able to dump them into the RBB and get back
what they paid for them originally. It would be funded by the
pension funds of our members of Congress, who now retire with
full pay after only one term. Isn't that a great "stimulus"
idea? It would definitely help "Main Street," which is what
the current people in charge promised they would do. But don't
hold your breath waiting for this to happen.

"LONG
TERM HOLD" IS DEAD IN A SECULAR BEAR MARKET
Excerpt from the Wellington
Letter, Feb. 23, 2009
.....
Some say that Mr. Buffett has
lost more than $30 billion. Yes, that's the value of
"long-term investing." Big, fat losses! The long-term approach
is all right during a secular bull market. And he really
capitalized on that over the past 40 years. But when a
long-term (secular) bull market changes to a secular bear
market, all the value investing in the world won't save
you. Investors will not care about the value of a stock today.
They sell because of declining economic conditions and,
therefore, reduced future profits, and because they need the
money.
Here is an example of the
financing problems of large firms, as of January 19, 2009. The
New York Times was looking for a loan. It finally
reached an agreement with Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim. He
will lend the firm about $250 million. Mr. Slim, one of the
wealthiest people in the world, will receive an annual
interest of about 14%. The unsecured notes he receives
will have detachable warrants for about 16 million shares,
which expire in January 2015.
This is noteworthy. First of
all, the NYT continues to raise money, which suggests a
significant negative cash flow. Secondly, it is willing to pay
14% interest. Even the most profitable company can't pay that
for its money based on operating profit margins. Obviously,
they were turned down by their banks. There was no word about
their being turned down by the Mafia. This is a sign of
DESPERATION!
Given the bankruptcy of
another large newspaper in Chicago, after it was bought by
billionaire Sam Zell, it's easy to conclude that the NYT may
meet a similar fate, billionaire financing or not. It's
apparent that Señor Slim will own the firm the next time it
runs out of money. But that may be his big mistake.

BAILOUTS DON'T
WORK
From the Wellington Letter Jan.13,09
.........................Roosevelt
threw huge amounts of money into infrastructure and "make work" programs. I
learned to play tennis in the 1950's on a concrete tennis court built by the WPA
program under Roosevelt. (It was painful). But in 1940, 10 years into the
depression, unemployment was 2.5 times higher than at the start of the
depression.
The great
economist of the Austrian School, Ludwig von Mises, wrote decades ago:
"There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom
brought about by credit expansion. The question is only whether the crisis
should come sooner as a result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit
expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system
involved. There has never been any attempt to abandon the credit expansion.
Indeed any crisis was simply an excuse to open the monetary spigots."
Unfortunately, few universities teach this "free market" school of economics. I
was a friend of Professor Hans Sennholz, who was one of the students of Dr. von
Mises. Auburn University has a Ludwig von Mises Center, and the organization,
FEE (Foundation for Economic Education) (www.fee.org),
has great articles on the school of free market economics on its website.
Pepperdine University has one of the greatest living scholars of Austrian
Economics, Dr. George Reisman. He wrote a 1000 page book on it, entitled "Capitalism:
A Treatise on Economics."
(Subscribe to Bert Dohmen’s WELLINGTON
LETTER today and get the full story,
with specific “What To Do”
recommendations, including charts to
prove the case. Go to:
www.dohmencapital.com.)

CHINA
IS THE CABOOSE, NOT THE LOCOMOTIVE
From the
Wellington Letter Jan.13,09
.....................China is
an export economy, in spite of governmental efforts to fuel domestic consumption
growth. But that will be tough when tens of millions of people are losing their
jobs. Over the past several years, exports have contributed about 20% to GDP.
However, in November exports showed the first decline on a year-on-year
basis since 2001.
Xinhua
Finance of China just reported these statistics, which suggest serious deflation
occurring in China right now:
The headline sentiment
index hit its third successive record low at 35.20, down from 39.87 in
November, and that gloom was reflected in other key indicators such as new
orders and production.
But the most alarming
signal in the latest monthly survey was seen in the indexes for prices. The
index for input prices, which was in the 80s as recently as August as the
government fought inflation on a number of fronts, hit an all-time low of
26.36, a record low for the third straight month. The index was at 31.89
last month.
The index for prices
received rose slightly but remained near the record low set last month.
The index was 36.82 in December, up from 35.56 last month.
Perhaps even more worrying
for the prospects of Chinese macroeconomic and monetary policy is that companies
appear to expect prices to continue falling.
On
January 8 we saw a report that electric power usage, a great indicator of
economic trends, is down sharply. Manufacturers used 11% less power, and
light industry used a hefty 21% less electricity. That tells you that the
economy is not only showing "reduced" growth, but negative growth.
In the
media, you still see the Pied Pipers of Wall Street trying to entice investors
into the stock market by saying that China will pull the global economies out of
the "slump." They don't say who will pull China out. Are there little Martians
landing in Beijing with flying saucers full of money?
The same
people tell you that raw materials will be in big demand again next year,
commodity prices will soar and oil may even get back to $100 per bbl. Well, I
haven't believed in fairy tales since I was 5 years old. You shouldn't either.
Disinvesting of Chinese stocks continues. When
cash is hard to get, you sell assets. In early January, Bank of America sold its
$2.8 billion stake in China Construction Bank. Several other banks around the
world did the same. Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-shing sold a $524 million share
in Bank of China. We can't know if this is just to raise capital, or whether
they all just want to reduce exposure to China.
China's
economic problems will infect all the smaller Asian nations. And that will cause
great pain in that part of the world. Therefore, don't count on China bailing
out the world. They will be too busy fighting the problems at home, both
economic and social. We expect several social unrest over there.
(Subscribe to Bert Dohmen’s WELLINGTON
LETTER today and get the full story,
with specific “What To Do”
recommendations, including charts to
prove the case. Go to:
www.dohmencapital.com.)

THE NEXT SUCKER PLAY: INFRASTRUCTURE
INVESTING
.......The new scam of
"infrastructure" will fare the same.
The President-elect is expected to
have an economic "stimulus" program
costing $1 trillion. To me it’s
incredible how the word "trillion" is
now thrown around as if it’s nothing.
Well, $1 trillion is 1000 times one
billion.
So far the government
and the Fed have committed the
taxpayers to $8.5 trillion of
bailouts, without any visible effects.
So, another $1 trillion for
infrastructure will be considered
"great." The big disappointment in
late 2009 will be when the
President-elect can't fulfill all the
high expectations of his supporters.
Too many intelligent people expect
miracles.
The Wall Street Pied
Pipers are beating the drums for
"infrastructure." That's apparently
the big play on the President-elect's
promises. I strongly caution against
these investments, except for another
trade to take advantage of the
foolishness of the public. It takes a
long time to approve such projects, to
design and engineer them, to award
bids and then to start construction.
It's estimated that after all is said
and done, about 4 cents of every
dollar appropriated enters the
consumer spending stream in the first
year.
Here are some
additional facts, which the Pied
Pipers don't tell you. Last year,
there was about $750 billion in
infrastructure projects. This year,
according to Morgan Stanley, there
will be zero for new projects. In
other words, you need $750 billion of
new projects next year just to get
back to the business of 2007. There is
no chance of that happening.
Even if they commit
$500 billion to infrastructure in
2009, it's estimated that in the first
year only 4% of this amount would go
into the economy. That's $20 billion.
It's less than a drop in the bucket.
It's a droplet of morning dew. It
takes a long time to gear up expensive
infrastructure projects. And once they
get going, it won't produce the
millions of jobs to offset the jobs
now being lost.
The first phase of such
sucker plays is the psychological
part, where these stocks are promoted,
analysts on TV hype them 12 hours a
day, and the unsuspecting investor
puts his last dollars into the stocks,
hoping to make up the losses he has
had this year in other stocks. The
second phase is when the friends of
Wall Street dump these stocks on the
casual investors just before the next
big decline.
Bottom line: the only
ones to make money in this will be the
lobbyists, the legislators, the few
firms that will get most of the booty
and, of course the brokerage firms
recommending the stocks. However, if
you disagree with our view, here is
the other side of the story as told by
the brokerage firm, Friedman Billings,
as reported by www.briefing.com:
It anticipates 2009
will be the year of "infrastructure,"
as the new Administration and Congress
aggressively use an Economic Recovery
Plan (ERP) to quickly direct funding
to highways, bridges, water/wetlands
restoration, institutional buildings,
energy conservation, etc.
Beneficiaries of an ERP should
include: (1) Heavy civil construction
companies, which should be immediate
beneficiaries given the $64 billion in
"ready-to-go" projects (GVA, STRL,
URS, PCR). (2) Local engineering and
consulting firms should see an
immediate increase in bidding
opportunities and overall increased
activity (URS, ACM, TTEK). (3)
Alternative energy and U.S. electric
T&D grid legislation and/or funding
could benefit several specialty
contractors and some equipment
manufacturers (PWR, MYRG, MTZ, TTEK,
PEC, FLR). (4) A focus on green
buildings and retrofits with a goal to
improve energy conservation could
impact manufacturing companies and
eventually the electrical and
mechanical contractors as
installations begin. The firm also
cites OMGI, GLDD, SGR, EME, FIX, IESC,
VMC, EXP, MLM, CBE, HUBB, LII, ITX,
ASD, and ITRI as potential
beneficiaries.
There you have both
sides of the story. Take your pick.
Who do you trust more?
BUY AND HOLD?
As you know, we have always preached
against the ruinous investment
strategy called the "long-term hold."
It is advocated primarily by those who
don't have the skills to time the
market. In a bear market, all stocks
go down, and sometimes significantly.
If you are billionaire Warren Buffett,
you can hold on while you are losing
50% or more on the stock. If you are
the average investor, you will panic
at the bottom.
I predict that Buffett
will lose about 60-70% of his wealth
in this bear market. But he will still
have billions left over. Many of the
world's former billionaires have
already lost 50-90% of their wealth,
and some are going bankrupt.
And if we are right in our forecast
that the "worst is still ahead," they
will lose even more. They could have
saved themselves tens of billions of
dollars with a $375 subscription to
our WELLINGTON LETTER last year.
That's a bargain!
(Subscribe to Bert Dohmen’s WELLINGTON
LETTER today and get the full story,
with specific “What To Do”
recommendations, including charts to
prove the case. Go to:
www.dohmencapital.com.)

UNEMPLOYMENT
SURGES AS THE ECONOMIC CRISIS
INTENSIFIES
Excerpt from January 13, 2009 Wellington Letter
.......
However, according to some analysts, if the
unemployment rate were calculated the same way it was in
previous recessions, the current unemployment rate would be a
whopping 11.4%.
Furthermore, if you count "discouraged" workers
who are no longer looking for a job, and those who are working
part-time but want full-time, the unemployment rate would
be 14%. Our forecast is that eventually we will see an
official rate of 12%. That will cause all the bulls to
reevaluate the cheerfulness. On January 3, 2009 the
President-elect said unemployment could go to 10%, which is
much higher than the consensus of economists. Eventually, he
will agree with my numbers.
Last April, the
official unemployment rate was about
4.7%. However, the actual unemployment
rate as calculated above was 8.1%.
Here is what the author of an article
on the subject wrote about that
number:
If we examine the BLS
data and add up the number of self
employed persons who are not working,
the number of persons who are working
part time because they can not find a
permanent full time job, and the
number of persons the BLS classifies
as unemployed, the total number of
people who are either unemployed or
underemployed equals 12,395,000
workers.
The government's
numbers are fudged to show lower
unemployment numbers. Don't believe
them. There isn't one economist that I
have heard who thinks unemployment can
go above 20%. Well, if you calculate
it correctly, as above, I think we
will get there over the next year or
two.
(Subscribe to Bert Dohmen’s WELLINGTON
LETTER today and get the full story,
with specific “What To Do”
recommendations, including charts to
prove the case. Go to:
www.dohmencapital.com.)

UNEMPLOYMENT SOARS.....
THE
WORST IS STILL AHEAD
Excerpt from Dec. 8 Wellington Letter
Until
now we have had a financial crisis, which affected mostly
firms and people in that industry, and larger firms that could
no longer get credit. But until September people weren't that
worried. Everyone considered this to be just a normal
"economic slump." I even stopped talking to people I met about
what I thought was ahead, because to them it wasn't credible.
My job is not to "convince" someone of my viewpoint.
But now
comes the "awakening." Since October, the consumer has
awakened to the dismal state of his finances. Hundreds of
thousands of people are losing their jobs, and they can't find
new ones. The crisis is now coming to "Main Street." This
is the most painful part, and we are just in the early phase.
It is
obvious that all our forecasts of the past 18 months are
coming true, unfortunately. Until now consumer spending had
plunged because of the inability to get credit. Now comes the
harder part: People losing their jobs, which reduces the
income of many families to welfare levels. The economic pain
will be much more severe than anything we have seen so far in
the financial markets.
All the bailouts
are aimed at the large financial
institutions. However, their problems
are not the cause, but a symptom of
the real problem. What is the real
problem? The consumer is tapped out.
He doesn't have any buying power left.
From 2003 to 2006 (4 years) about 80%
of GDP growth was attributable to the
mortgage refinancing (MEW). That was
called the "home ATM."
That money is now gone and so is the
driving force for the economy. All the
bailouts in the world can only slow
the economic decline, not prevent it.
And they certainly can't produce new
economic growth. It's absurd to call
these bailouts "stimulus." They are
"rescue missions."
Economists don't consider the
"snowball effect." There is a chain
reaction all through the economy. The
"virtuous cycle" on the upside becomes
the destructive chain reaction on the
downside. Credit is no longer
available, so the consumer stops
spending. That leads to downsizing and
bankruptcies of firms geared to the
consumer, and in the U.S. that's 70%
of GDP. This causes unemployment to
soar, causing even more businesses to
go bankrupt.
The real estate these firms occupy
will be empty. Developers and owners
of shopping centers can't get credit
so they will go bankrupt when the
billion-dollar loans come due. As
defaults in mortgages and other types
of consumer credit escalate, the
credit market will freeze even more.
That causes further economic erosion,
more people downsizing or going out of
business, and a deeper recession. Are
the people in Washington considering
this snowballing effect?
Tax rates must be cut significantly,
for everyone, especially small, Sub S
firms, which are taxed at the
individual rate. But this is exactly
the sector that the President-elect
has targeted for big tax increases. He
calls these people "the wealthy." We
can only hope that when faced with the
stark reality of a potential
depression, his advisors will be able
to change his mind.
The dismal state of the retail sector,
which is now seeing the worst
conditions in about 30 years, confirms
what is happening. Retail sales are
plunging in the U.S., and around the
world. This will be the worst
Christmas shopping season in many
decades. I predict that retail sales
will be down as much as 30-40% in Q4
for the hardest hit stores. Bankruptcy
filings in January will skyrocket.
In spite of the holiday season, there
are store closings everywhere. Wait
until January! The shopping centers
will empty out. So far over the past
12 months or so, we have this:
Ann Taylor will close 117 stores,
Eddie Bauer 27 stores and two outlets,
Lane Bryant 150 stores, Talbots 78
kid/men stores and 22 women stores,
The Gap 85 stores, Foot Locker 140
stores, Disney Store 98 stores
acquired from The Children’s Palace,
Home Depot 15 stores, Macys 9 stores,
Pacific Sunwear 154 stores, Pep Boys
33 stores, Ethan Allen 12 stores,
Wilson Leather 158 stores, Sharper
Image 90 stores, KB Toys 384 stores,
Dillards 6 stores.
One retail analyst, who has been
correctly bearish all year, expects
the bankruptcy of 14 large retail
chains early next year. He didn't name
them.
The job losses are accelerating. The
economists that had been arguing until
September that we might not even see a
recession, apparently because they
felt that they themselves had job
security, are now faced with the
reality of rising unemployment, which
stands now at 6.7%. However, they
never give up. Their new story is that
we are approaching the "end of the
recession." That's the recession that
they never saw coming. But now they
are the experts in declaring its end.
The latest jobs report shows that
533,000 people lost their jobs.
Actually, if you count the
"discouraged workers" who are no
longer looking for jobs, the number
was over 650,000. The average work
week is 33.5 hours, the lowest since
1964, when they started keeping
records.
In our November 10 issue, we wrote:
The unemployment rate jumped to 6.5%
last month, the highest since 1994.
Even worse, the job loss for the prior
months was revised upward
significantly. In a recession, such
revisions are normal as the first
figures don't capture the job loss at
small firms. In my view, the
unemployment rate will be at 9%
sometime by next summer, and 11-12% in
about two years from now.
Let me emphasize that, although the
majority of economists would consider
my forecasts above as "extreme," I
think the numbers are on conservative
side. The latest number is 6.7%
unemployment.
On Nov. 21, Goldman Sachs revised its
own economic forecasts: They forecast
unemployment will reach 9% by Q4
2009. We gave that number two
months ago.
Their Q4 of 2008 GDP forecast was
revised downward from a decline of
3.5%, to a decline of 5% in Q4
(at an annual rate). That has been our
forecast for some time.
But these numbers are all "cheerful"
compared to what we are likely to see
in 2009. We will see economic numbers
so bad that even the "perma-bullish"
economists will start considering
depression. More on that in the next
issue. I don't want to spoil the
holidays for you.
(Subscribe to Bert Dohmen’s WELLINGTON
LETTER today and get the full story,
with specific “What To Do”
recommendations, including charts to
prove the case. Go to:
www.dohmencapital.com.)

MORTGAGE TIME BOMBS
Excerpt from Wellington
Letter Dec. 8, 2008 issue
Option-adjustable-rate mortgages were very popular during the
housing boom. They allowed borrowers to pay interest only for
as long as five years. The monthly payment was capped and if
rates went up, the difference was just added to the loan.
However,
the loans also have a cap. Once that cap is reached the loans
are "recast." Because they have only paid interest for several
years, and thus have less time to the end of the loan, the
monthly principal repayment is much higher.
It's
estimated that of the $200 billion in option ARMs outstanding,
more than a quarter will be recast in 2009 and 2010. Payments
will rise some 63% on these mortgages, increasing the average
borrower's home expense by more than $1,000 a month.
The
rating firm Fitch estimates that this dramatic increase could
cause delinquencies to double. Wachovia held $122 billion of
option ARMs at the end of the second quarter, Washington
Mutual about $53 billion
The percentage of mortgages 30 days or
more overdue rose to 6.99%. Mortgages
in foreclosure rose to 2.97%, both
all-time highs in the history of the
survey (which goes back 29 years).
And the huge problem over the next
several years will be municipalities
and states not being able to pay the
bills and not able to borrow, except
from the Federal government.
Therefore, they will cut their highly
bloated payrolls, causing even more
unemployment. Muni-bonds will default,
further exacerbating the credit
freeze. How many investors have
contemplated these upcoming problems?
One interesting item: We wrote last
month that the only booming industries
for the next several years will be
makers of alcoholic beverages as
people drown their sorrows, and real
estate firms in Washington, D.C., as
the nation’s capital enters another
big growth phase. Well, on Dec. 5 the
maker of Jack Daniels whisky announced
better than expected sales and raised
its sales guidance for next year.
(Subscribe to Bert Dohmen’s WELLINGTON
LETTER today and get the full story,
with specific “What To Do”
recommendations, including charts to
prove the case. Go to:
www.dohmencapital.com.)

THE
INCREDIBLE SHRINKING WALL STREET
By Bert Dohmen : Post-election, Nov.
2008
NY Mayor
Bloomberg said that Wall Street may lose over 140,000 jobs. Will
there be anyone left? Who will fill those buildings? And how will
the owners of the buildings service the mortgages?
To my knowledge,
there is only one Wall Street investment bank remaining, Lazard. The
other two, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley converted to regular
banks so they would be eligible for bailouts by the Fed.
The "virtuous
cycle" of the boom years is now in reverse. It's like a big rock
dropped into a pond. Soon all the ripples envelop everything on the
pond. The investment banks were leveraged 40 to 1, with the special
consent of the SEC in 2004. William Donaldson, co-founder of a large
Wall Street firm, was the head of the SEC. The fox guarding the
henhouse. With that much leverage, if your investments decline 2.5%,
you have lost 100% of your equity. Imagine, trying to deleverage
that! And that is what the financial firms are trying to do now,
with taxpayer money.
As
New York office buildings empty out, apartments will as well.
And then the retailers in NY will see their customers
disappear. REIT'S with big exposure to NY will be especially
hard hit.
Wall Street guys made unbelievable
bonuses during the boom years. Now we
have the evidence that the booms were
nothing but financial engineering
using unbelievably high leverage.
"Genius" was nothing more than extreme
leverage in a rising market. The
private equity guys were in the
frontline feeding at the trough of
artificial wealth. I met many of these
"hot shots" in 2006 and 2007. Last
year when several of them said that,
"We have never seen conditions this
bullish," I asked them if that isn't
the perfect description of every major
economic boom top? Only one of them
said, "When the music stops, we have
to be sure we have a chair to sit on."
The others just wouldn't accept my
analysis that a major top was being
formed, and that we would go into a
global financial crisis, created by
them and their friends.
Human nature never changes. The
business of Private Equity (PE) firms
was to buy companies that were public
and take them private. They would
give the CEO's and top guys huge
bonuses to agree to the buyouts. I
would describe that as "bribery,"
because the CEO has the responsibility
to work for the shareholders. They
didn't. Once the deal was agreed on,
the PE firm would get
multi-billion-dollar loans, all
guaranteed by the assets of the
company they were buying. Yes, you can
by a company with that company’s own
money! Amazing.
After the deal was consummated, the PE
firm would take billions of dollars
of fees out of the acquired company,
such as an acquisition fee, consulting
fees, structuring fees, etc. Then the
PE firm would usually have the
acquired company declare a large
dividend, payable to the PE firm. That
meant more billions of dollars going
out.
In the end, you have an over-indebted
carcass remaining. In good times, the
company might survive if it can raise
the prices of its products
substantially. In bad times, as now,
these companies will go bankrupt. And
that's what we will see over the next
five years. In the meantime, the
partners of the PE firms will have
taken their billions. They paid a low
"capital gains tax rate" on that
money, instead of ordinary income tax
like the rest of us. When last year
some members of Congress wanted to tax
this money at ordinary rates, the PE
guys cried out loud that it would
destroy capitalism and the Western
world as we know it.
Well, the great thing about a change
in regime is that such excesses may be
addressed. The emphasis is on the word
"may." Never count out the lobbyists
and their virtually unlimited
check-writing ability.
People ask me, is there any area that
will benefit from these terrible
trends? I can only think of two:
alcoholic beverages and office REIT's
focusing on Washington, D.C. When
people finally have the courage to
open their brokerage statements, they
will need a strong drink to reduce the
pain. On the REIT side, expect
hundreds of thousands of people to be
hired to implement all the social
programs of "Big Government." They
need office space and places to live.
Washington will boom. There is great
job security in government. The advice
to college graduates will no longer be
"plastics," but "go to Washington."
(Subscribe to Bert Dohmen’s WELLINGTON
LETTER today and get the full story,
with specific “What To Do”
recommendations, including charts to
prove the case. Go to:
www.dohmencapital.com.)

WARREN BUFFETT COULD BE WRONG!
October 28,
2008 . By Bert
Dohmen, founder of Bert Dohmen's Wellington Letter
Over the years,
Warren Buffett has been an extraordinary investor. But times change,
and those who don't recognize the changes, will find out that some
of the old theories no longer work.
The stock of
Mr. Buffett's company, Berkshire, is down over 21% in just the last
5 months. Yes, I know, the long term investor knows that eventually
the stock market goes up again. But what they don't tell you is that
sometimes it can take 20 years or more for the market to break even.
Mr. Buffett
recently wrote an op-ed piece in the NYT. He wrote that he is
buying stocks now in his "personal" account, where formerly he only
had U.S. Treasury bonds. He confessed that he didn't know where the
stock market would be a year from now, but he did "know"
that "5, 10, and 20 years from now most major companies will be
setting new profit records." How does he know?
Over the
years, Warren Buffett has been an extraordinary investor. But
times change, and those who don't recognize the changes, will
find out that some of the old theories no longer work.
The stock
of Mr. Buffett's company, Berkshire, is down over 21% in just
the last 5 months. Yes, I know, the long term investor knows
that eventually the stock market goes up again. But what they
don't tell you is that sometimes it can take 20 years or more
for the market to break even.
Mr. Buffett recently wrote an op-ed piece in the NYT.
He wrote that he is buying stocks now in his "personal"
account, where formerly he only had U.S. Treasury bonds. He
confessed that he didn't know where the stock market would be
a year from now, but he did "know" that "5, 10, and 20
years from now most major companies will be setting new profit
records." How does he know?
And then he talked about the Great Depression. Well, let's
look at that bear market. First of
all, it took until 1954, 25 years, for
the DJI to get back to where it was in
1929. Do you have 25 years just to
break even? Will you live that long?
When he wrote the article, it was one year from the great
bull market top of Oct. 2007. Had he
bought the DJI one year from the 1929
top, he would have bought at 246,
which was down 36% from the
1929 top. When his article was
published on Oct. 17, the DJI was
down 36% from the Oct. 2007 top!
Amazing! This tells us that so far,
the market is following a pattern
similar to 1929. The wiggles may not
be identical, but it’s the destination
that's important. As Mark Twain said,
"History may not repeat exactly, but
it rhymes."
From the 1930 level cited above, the DJI declined to 41,
down another 83% from the Sept. 1930
level. If that repeats, Mr.
Buffett may lose 83% of his investment
to the eventual bear market bottom.
I would prefer not to lose that much.
As a billionaire, who uses a small
part of his wealth for stocks, that
loss may only be a drop in the bucket.
For the average investor, it means
ruin.
The problem is that all these allegedly intelligent people
go by the experiences of the past 50
years. But as we warned last year, we
are in the part of the cycle which at
minimum will be similar to the 1930's,
or potentially a 200-year event. Hope
won't change that. The above is based
on analysis, not the misplaced
optimism you hear everywhere.
Some high profile people believe it is their “duty” to be
optimistic, in the hope that it will
change the trend of the markets. Well,
if all the governmental bailout
programs and guarantees of the past
month, amounting to about $2 TRILLION,
can't stop the bear market and
evolving financial crisis, do they
really think that expressing false
optimism in the media will do it? Of
course not. The only thing it
accomplishes is to mislead the
uninformed public, their clients,
causing them to lose their savings and
retirement funds.
As I wrote earlier this year, if you follow the "buy and
hold" guys, you had better start
packing for a trip to the poor house.
And then he talked about the Great Depression. Well, let's
look at that bear market. First of
all, it took until 1954, 25 years, for
the DJI to get back to where it was in
1929. Do you have 25 years just to
break even? Will you live that long?
When he wrote the article, it was one year from the great
bull market top of Oct. 2007. Had he
bought the DJI one year from the 1929
top, he would have bought at 246,
which was down 36% from the
1929 top. When his article was
published on Oct. 17, the DJI was
down 36% from the Oct. 2007 top!
Amazing! This tells us that so far,
the market is following a pattern
similar to 1929. The wiggles may not
be identical, but it’s the destination
that's important. As Mark Twain said,
"History may not repeat exactly, but
it rhymes."
From the 1930 level cited above, the DJI declined to 41,
down another 83% from the Sept. 1930
level. If that repeats, Mr.
Buffett may lose 83% of his investment
to the eventual bear market bottom.
I would prefer not to lose that much.
As a billionaire, who uses a small
part of his wealth for stocks, that
loss may only be a drop in the bucket.
For the average investor, it means
ruin.
The problem is that all these allegedly intelligent people
go by the experiences of the past 50
years. But as we warned last year, we
are in the part of the cycle which at
minimum will be similar to the 1930's,
or potentially a 200-year event. Hope
won't change that. The above is based
on analysis, not the misplaced
optimism you hear everywhere.
Some high profile people believe it is their “duty” to be
optimistic, in the hope that it will
change the trend of the markets. Well,
if all the governmental bailout
programs and guarantees of the past
month, amounting to about $2 TRILLION,
can't stop the bear market and
evolving financial crisis, do they
really think that expressing false
optimism in the media will do it? Of
course not. The only thing it
accomplishes is to mislead the
uninformed public, their clients,
causing them to lose their savings and
retirement funds.
As I wrote earlier this year, if you follow the "buy and
hold" guys, you had better start
packing for a trip to the poor house.
(Subscribe to Bert Dohmen’s WELLINGTON
LETTER today and get the full story,
with specific “What To Do”
recommendations, including charts to
prove the case. Go to:
www.dohmencapital.com.)

LONG
TERM: WHY THE WORST IS STILL AHEAD
Excerpt from Bert
Dohmen’s Wellington Letter of Oct. 13, 2008
Although the
stock markets should have a rally, looking out over the next year,
the worst is still ahead. As we have advised previously, if you want
to see whether financial stress is easing or intensifying, just
watch the credit spreads. One I like is the TED Spread. It’s the
difference in yield between LIBOR and T-bills. When it widens, it
indicates stress. Currently, it’s at the highest level ever. But
even that is fictitious, as no one is lending at the LIBOR rate – or
any other. The credit markets are frozen.
That means the
global economies are now plunging off of a cliff without a safety
net below. The wheels of commerce are grinding to a halt.
During this year
the freeze in the vital commercial paper (CP) market intensified. I
warned about this late last year when the CP outstanding diminished
by about $1 TRILLION because new CP’s could not be sold. This market
is used by companies to get short-term (90 days) money for corporate
purposes, such as preparing for seasonal cash needs like Christmas.
Now that market is basically shut down.
|